Mr_Iko

In the end, as my friend Pasquale Inessa from "Palemmo" would say: "Picciò, accà tutt'ammici! Tutt'ammici siamo!"

This solution limits but does not extinguish the problem of multiple reviews where the character of manifest uselessness cannot be observed. Certainly, I had previously stated that some multiple reviews sometimes integrate with each other, and in this case, I believe it is useful to keep them "on the same level," with the same dignity.

Here, in this case (self-evident review) I propose not to publish it "obviously," not to inform users through the newsletter, but rather to hide it behind a simple warning in the space below: the self-evident review will be accessible to everyone only through the "original" review, it will live in reflected light, not with its own life but almost parasitically. If we publish it without publicizing it, I believe we achieve the following reasonable objectives: 1. no obstruction to the writing of already written reviews and consequently respect for the integrity of the libertarian principle 2. Discouragement for the reviewer, since their writing will remain "in the shadow" of another writing 3. the possibility to comment and vote separately on the review (which would not occur if it were introduced as a comment, as portrayed by Hal). In my opinion, it is sufficient to limit the publicity of reviews (but let it be clear SELF-EVIDENT, USELESS, OBJECTIVELY BAD REVIEWS BECAUSE INCOMPLETE OR LACKING). Hal I await your further corrective, gradually (step by step) we will find a solution. I propose to limit ourselves for now to the solution of the problem of multiple reviews, and then, once the topic is exhausted, shift the attention to "commercial" reviews and reviews that consist of just one line.

Exactly, let's not confuse rules and principles. Principles are the highest "value" of any system (from the condominium statute to the framework of our Republic), while rules are merely the necessary tools for realizing those principles, their concrete specification. Let's move on to multiple reviews. I believe it is pointless to reiterate how prohibiting them would be a clear limitation of the libertarian "principle" expressed by the site. And it would be, besides being incorrect, also absurd. Think of a scenario where the first review (in chronological order) is objectively "poor" (because it omits relevant data, contains inaccuracies, or is simply poorly written): in this case, a subsequent review would only improve both the completeness of information (and thus culture) and the user's satisfaction. The situation is different when it comes to a review that is unnecessary, self-evident, or merely a mindless imitation. Perhaps in this case, the repetition of a substantially similar and uninteresting text (it goes without saying that it should be established in advance that matching content renders the review less "interesting") would be, if not outright vexatious, at least annoying for users. -continues-

Who knows why Carmela is particularly liked by Sicilians... It's just chauvinism! Music has no borders, art is universal and not local. Don't forget 'bout it.

Dear Bowie friends, here’s the setlist he performed for the opening concert of the Reality show tour in Copenhagen: setlist!

1. New Killer Star
2. Afraid
3. Fame
4. Cactus
5. Battle For Britain
6. Fall Dog Bombs The Moon
7. Breaking Glass (short)
8. Reality
9. Changes
10. TMWSTW (original ver)
11. Hallo Spaceboy
12. Under Pressure
13. Sunday
14. Bring Me The Disco King
15. She'll Drive The Big Car
16. Ashes To Ashes
17. Never Get Old
18. Pablo Picasso
19. Fantastic Voyage
20. I'm Afraid Of Americans
21. Rebel Rebel (new ver)
22. Heroes
23. Heathen

Then the encore:
24. Slip Away
25. Hang On To Yourself
26. Let's Dance
27. Ziggy Stardust

Twenty-seven tracks for two and a half hours (including breaks) of concert!... Hummm... I'm already enjoying it! You can really notice the strong presence of Heathen and (of course) the latest album, plus some timeless hits, among which his favorite song, Ashes to Ashes. Yay, the 24th is approaching...
One last thing: Notizie, gossip, foto e news su MTV
As I mentioned, the tickets have all been sold out...

VxS, you who owe me 19 euros, are you punishing me too???

Anyway, I believe that the review of the Living's live performance is a thousand times better than this one. It's just that you need to have the right... umm... let's say "mindset" to understand it and, consequently, appreciate it. If you had been there, you would have written it that way too, I swear...

No, honestly I read it a while ago on the Radio Radicale website. I was doing some research for my own reasons on copyright law and I was told that Radio Radicale had done a program on the subject. So I started to see if it was possible to listen to it again in streaming or something like that, and I stumbled upon Glass. I liked it and wanted to include it.

This doesn't change the fact that this particular review is beautiful. But if a hundred directors make a hundred films only about the First Gulf War (and there are far more things to say than about Radiohead), even if they were 100 masterpieces like Stanley Kubrick's, I would get bored!!!! Even if they were the hundred most beautiful films in the history of war cinema, I wouldn't be able to stomach them all! Enough, please... Don't just look at the little garden of your home; there’s a beautiful world waiting for you. And I already know that tomorrow I’ll get an email saying, "We have a new review on Radiohead, take a spin and let us know what you think..."