Mr_Iko

As I often say, "docendo disco," being careful to note that "semper docendo nihil disco," but I am immensely pleased that you remembered some of my words. This means they weren't in vain. I permit myself to quote you as well, with the preliminary declaration that I do not want to make you angry any further: "I've seen you a bit too 'tense' lately, don’t take de-baser too seriously because it can hurt." However, I don't believe that jk is so deeply influenced by my words that he would abandon this haven. He himself said that I am a despicable being who, at the mere sight of my comments or reviews, induces in him "nausea" (comment number 3). But I always and only talk about reviews and records, never about people. You know this. It’s unfortunate that you take it as a personal offense; it is beyond my intentions. But I will never say that this is a good review because I do not think so. I remain in my position of being unpleasant. One should never take sides in anything, or one becomes a nuisance. This is my last comment on this page; I am tired of this story.

I understand but I don't agree, I use but I don't abuse.

Determined and convinced! Alright... f***... let's play it safe, a simple and quick game and let's see what happens...

Pollock, thank you, now I know what job I'll have when I grow up: the defecation inducer. Thank you, Pollock, I truly needed your comment. It's really time to write it: "DOCENDO DISCO." P.S.: do you know where I'm sending you with this comment? It's the consequence of the action I induce with my comments...

Thank you G_à, but the hope is that you never need one for important matters. Lawyers manage to mess everything up...

Anomalous review that generates conflicting opinions. Indeed, the confusing composition of the sentences creates misunderstandings, not due to the revealed substance but because of the form in which it encapsulates the thoughts. When I say that the Italian used is important (and so, my friend, you call me a flowery, baroque cicisbeo :-D) and you don’t understand it, I’m trying to imply that sentences that are not clearly comprehensible generate this type of crisis. Moreover, I do not appreciate (but this is personal) the declaration of one's political affiliation while reviewing, as it suppresses the sense of objectivity, even if the statement is made in an attempt to guarantee objectivity itself. Okay, reviews are a great way to talk "also" about oneself, but one should not dare so much. I conclude by saying that it seems to me a good review that, if supported by a greater care of language enhancing the communicative capacity of the writing, would have been excellent. Tzunami is not entirely wrong about the citation as it is not pertinent and about the construction of the first sentence.

The FFF French Funk Foundation are amazing. I used to listen to them about ten years ago, they have a killer groove!

Dead and buried after the third album. They unfortunately have nothing more to say. Although I really like Stewart Zender (that's what the bassist is called, right?) because the way he plays the bass makes me explode with the desire to dance to the rhythm of his lines. They were good, what a pity.

Anyway, the guys have great potential. They are very poetic. And Bellamy is still a rascal, which hints at his maturation. Let's say that for now it’s impossible to predict the future of these guys. If they changed the producer and had some time to make the albums without being pressured by preset deadlines, they could do very good things. A TURNAROUND IS URGENT!

Which private email, Frantz? I don’t remember, maybe I forgot it. When did you send it? I apologize in advance anyway. As for Marcelo: New Born and Plug in Baby do not erase the mediocrity of Origin. The critics (the real ones) say it’s a sufficient album, while I believe it’s a terrible album, poorly produced, poorly arranged, and with banal or underdeveloped songs. There hasn’t been enough attention given. However, honestly, I don’t understand the content of your message: you like The Strokes and Muse, but you don’t like Muse but you do like The Strokes, you don’t like much of Muse but some things remind you of The Strokes… Why do you say that if Muse are photocopying themselves you don’t like them AFTER saying that Absolution is similar to Origin, so (by transitive property) I deduce that you don’t like Absolution? In reality, I’m not too fond of it either (I’m still waiting for someone to explain to me the "mass phenomenon" Muse). Sorry if I didn’t understand your message, it’s probably my fault. But give me some more information so I can understand.