primiballi

Thank you everyone. @aputello: take at least another couple... or, better, bring home 4 live ones, you can't go wrong with that... Kisses

Don't worry, for many this is just a final dance and sometimes I believe it too, just as I firmly believe—you won't hold it against me (and our beloved prime minister would certainly agree)—that there are few beautiful things like the hymen... And anyway, "Senzo" by Abdullah Ibrahim, which I'm currently listening to in the office before the arrival of clients, now that would be the perfect background for a barbershop. Kisses.

Could it be that you're biased (at best)? Kisses

very good, I don't need to tell you that I find everything extremely, immensely shareable. And of course, thank you for the dedication, regarding which I wrote to you in private. Kisses

Well... dear Imene (you know I know that unfortunately it doesn’t mean that, with your name, but I like to call you that, I hope you don't mind), thank you for being the only one who has commented so far (all the various paladins of anti-commerce, whenever you review something that isn’t Vasco or Liga, for some reason, they disappear... bah), but please don't talk to me about new wine, nonsensical gazzosino meant for women, useful (perhaps) to lighten – or try to lighten – the roasted chestnuts. Kisses, and let’s not joke about wine, my dear.

@pallazzo: you are wrong, and with legal skill you jump into the only example that could disprove (but not entirely, think about it -... plasma, worthy payments to those who donate, etc...-) the theory. In reality, if you analyze every type of volunteering, it always fills the gaps left by the State. A modern, rich, and efficient Welfare State does not need volunteering because, with everybody's money (that wouldn't go to lazy and various invalids), it would take care of everything. Because after such an event, it would have set up temporary and luxurious shacks in two days. Because it wouldn't have a silly, crybaby pedophile as president but someone who sees the problems and solves them. But, as you know, there is what is shown on TV, and nothing else...(so the problems of Naples, since they are no longer visible, don't exist, and soon it will be Abruzzo's turn). But let's not digress: think about it. The presence of volunteering is always inversely proportional to that of the State. It is this way, and it cannot be otherwise. Kisses.

@entence: volunteering is NOT a harm, it is evidence of the State's failure. Then, starting from this fact which I find indisputable (it is our fault as a State if when something happens there is no money, resources, and people) everyone can choose, in their own private sphere, what to do. That's all, I never said or thought it was a harm in absolute terms (at least not me...). Kisses

bah....in my opinion, you're being too kind...first of all, you know I don't agree with the downfall of jovanotto...to fall, one must have risen first.... Then honestly, in my view, there's nothing redeemable about this operation...inside it, there's people (pausini...?) who could rebuild an entire village with a tenth of their annual earnings...and others who are trying to get noticed next to pausini in hopes of earning at least a fraction of what she makes (even though they might be much more talented...). In short: inside, there's the one who wrote Diesel and the one who conceived Luci A San Siro...it's making me want to vomit...

Dearest Gustavo, the problem, as I mentioned in the review, is on two levels: one musical (you've already expressed yourself) and one concerning the merits of the operation, where you shouldn't just get away with a "welcome," stemming from that "everything goes" and akin to that "let's be nice to each other," which are the greatest national-cultural evils of Italy, or rather: of itaglia. Kisses

Damn: we all agree too much… and I was hoping for a healthy and conscious debate… Anyway, that’s fine, even though it would be lovely to know why those who were absent were absent (among them, I forgot Prince DeGregori…). Kisses