primiballi

I thank everyone, including those who don’t think like me. @alfredo: I agree with your post no. 32, while I have doubts about 33, given that I, for obvious and well-known reasons, like everyone talibanically, how can we not consider works like "the ghost of tom joad" or "devils&dust"? or the fantastic tribute to Seeger? Change your mind, come on... Welcome to the new Myspace!

True: absolute respect for Cave and Young (mentioned here) as obviously for Dylan (mysteriously not mentioned), but some objective data does exist in life, doesn’t it? Or is everything always relative? 30/32 songs a night, all linked one to another, over 200 in the repertoire, the requests... all "little things"? Then, of course, one can say that Bowie’s not even 2 hours are superior (they're certainly not inferior), but... something has to be acknowledged... right? Kisses

@traumacranico: since you love quotes, rhetorical devices, and especially the fact that you compulsively like me, I'm also giving you this one: "the world is divided into two categories, those who are crazy about Springsteen, and those who have never seen him live." Big kisses.

dear traumacronico, it's pointless to emphasize the total disagreement: I've seen cave just as I've seen morrison (van) (so I’m covering myself in advance with someone else), and I reiterate: the greatest performer of all time. I've also said and repeated, even if it's clear you don't see it, that I consider myself completely biased for an objective judgment. The closing: direct your arrows at New York Magazine. Kisses Welcome to the new Myspace!

everything is false... and, unless I'm living on the Moon (not to be ruled out), it seems to me that the operation is already gracefully heading to oblivion...

@hardrock: I too will be listening to my Maestro this evening. The gist of the discourse (even yesterday many compared the Boss to Madonna) is: can the undisputed dignity of rock be opposed, on different terms, to an equally undisputed dignity of pop? And are there middle grounds? Kisses

@hardrock: I might have explained myself poorly. What I meant to say is that U2 have been very clever in combining form and substance. They still sound great (of course, for those who like them), Bono is in great shape, and the latest album (I’ve written about it) is fundamentally good. Then there's the "circus," which I personally appreciate, even though I will always prioritize form over substance. I’ve decided to dedicate my little life as a musician to the Boss, and not at all for the show, but for the living material within it. I don't think there's a contradiction. For example: if I prefer to eat in an Osteria (and I do, I swear), every now and then a fancy restaurant is fine too. It’s, in my opinion, about not being narrow-minded, not being opportunistic. The discussion, if you want, and obviously on a civil level, is long. And it could be interesting. Kisses

@ux, if I were sector-specific, then yes, but I’m not. I just want to say that - you know - the Led Zeppelin of their golden years were better, even though I really enjoyed the U2 concert the other night... No defensive moves and no flattery: trust me, I only write what I think, no sleaziness and no suck-up behavior. Kisses

Anyway, it's beautiful: you write a jazz review and no one shows up... you write about Vasco and U2 and you always see the same faces with the same stuff... guys: you're a bit predictable, aren't you? Kisses

@lupin: for 80 leuri you could eat and drink much better than this, come on...@gustavino: no automatism, not everyone is like that, but many are...here on DeB, as you know, for a long time there was the reign of prevailing frustration...today, all things considered, it's much better...nice guys like fiquata (who, despite making personal references, wouldn’t scare even a chicken, and should study their own concept of the period instead of discussing the correct commas of others) don’t count, and they deserve my perpetual and affectionate kiss.@UhuhPanicoUhuh: wash your mouth out before invoking the name of Donatella A Reazione in vain.