odradek

Helianthum, Scaruffi is Poletti's excuse. Since he says things that are evidently "strong" and not very shareable, Poletti thinks he can take advantage of this to justify his eagerness to write pages like this one. What does Scaruffi have to do with it? Anyway, to answer you, Scaruffi, born in Italy but a resident of the USA for over twenty years, is the first in the world to have conceived and created a website dedicated, among other things, to the history of rock. A kind of modern-day encyclopedist, with the ability to interpret a staggering amount of musical products and more according to his own personal vision. Type his name into Google and go to the homepage: you'll get an idea. But there is no connection with Poletti's "reviews." Despite all the criticisms that can be leveled at him, the old Piero remains an accurate and passionate pioneer, with an undeniable scientific and historical preparation.

I like the title (how could I not) We'll listen to all this good stuff.

Well, then if an editor comes by these parts, they might take it off in the other, the accent.

In fact, I've never heard of them. You slap a five-star rating and research is a must...

Hi, Socrates. In a way, I see it like Sylvian, who I always find among the comments on your pages, even though I stopped at Cupid & Psyche. I was quite curious about this return, which has sparked various reactions, as one might expect. Your review makes me eager to listen...

Auntie always writes beautiful pages and undoubtedly has the ability to intrigue. However, based on the pieces I've listened to on the site, it seems I wouldn't be able to give more than a 3 to these charming young sexy ones. The names of local bands that appear in the text accompanying the presentation of this album seem much more interesting and original than theirs. It’s true, though: it is still pop, but in certain cases, the feeling of déjà vu is much stronger than any other consideration, at least for me. Perhaps as a whole it isn't like this. I’ll end up getting a "complete" listen, only to discover later that my first impression was misleading. It wouldn’t be the first time, after all.

It doesn't seem bad to me, judging by other photographs as well. There's already a review, on DeBaser, of her previous album, which doesn't appear in the entry because the accent on the initial E of her name is missing (it would be good to correct the name so that they can be merged). The album is not bad, between a 3 and a 4. Just like the previous one wasn't bad either. But they didn't fully convince me. Maybe I'll listen to them again and tell you why.

And besides cabaret, do you also like music?

How old are you? And what's your zodiac sign?

How cute. But are you Italian?