puntiniCAZpuntini

<< the disease that has always afflicted Americans: gigantism >> And the problem in Palermo is Traffic. The ten-minute speech (and several pages in the printed version) is not about "Gigantism" (a truly unsolvable issue, not a source of immense taxes), but about capitalism which - exploiting the vastness of the USA - already in the sixties showed the flaw, with the big getting bigger and the small becoming smaller, or merely employees. He is critical of large-scale distribution, with the one-size-fits-all cash & carry service instead of personalized service, and especially the fact that large chains don’t know who to pay off, because perhaps the owner lives in London or on the other side of the coast. The quote to mention was the one that said something like "you can’t hit someone in the heart if you don’t know where it is," not the one about going home, which was just a consequence. And "The Marseillais" are not the "Corsican Mafia," which is called Brise De Mer and was a group of mud-stained shepherds wandering with donkeys in the late sixties. Now they are somebody, back then they weren't. And not even "The Marseillais" are the Marseillais you refer to, who is called "Milieu," born in Marseille but didn’t stay still there. The gang (note well: gang) known as "The Marseillais" were four Roman assholes who had connections with the "Milieu" for drugs, and kidnapped people just like all gangs did. In my opinion, from all these mafia movies you watch, you understood shit (due to your limited basic knowledge), but maybe it’s just an impression. However, a strong one. The movie is well made, certainly better than this one about Lucas than that one about George Jung or that crap about Mr. Nice.

He was on tour with Plasma Expander, who are Italian (or at least one of them is) but maybe they live in America. If he had done a "bonus disc" (like the one from Each One) with the same tracks a bit shorter (half the length), it would have been quite appreciated. As it is, it's a bit too diluted even for me, yet not as heavy as I expected.

<< A masterpiece based on nothing. >> Indeed, on a nothing that has sold a couple of million copies, that has been reprinted three or four times, that has been published in every language of the civilized world. They made a decent adaptation, completely distorting the meaning of the book (in fact, the reason for the title in the film is not grasped) rather than attempting to translate it into thoughts, but it is still a cinematic adaptation of a bestseller.

In my opinion, you should extinguish yourself.

I wish I could be a woman and go back to high school to write it in my diary.

Bro, have you ever heard of printed media? First, you review The Valachi Papers, which is a book by Peter Maas, and assign all the "discoveries" to the film. Now, All the President's Men is a film by Alan Pakula, not a book by...(I can't remember the authors of that). And above all, it's the film that revealed all the secrets of Watergate. You took it a bit lightly; okay, American journalism wasn't and isn't in great shape (just like the rest of the world's), but to say that all the backstories are in a movie is ridiculous, not even in Duckburg. If someone follows the newspapers, they always know things before and better than the little film that does a summary for those with disabilities.

Troy McLure is also cool.

40% of the review is about the trailer, "first time in history." Now go to YouTube, type "new album trailer," check the results. Grab the katana and do what needs to be done.

One of the few who still makes me discover great bands. This one is a "must-have," without a doubt. Those who don’t choose it probably have the original discography of Def Leppard at home and various T-shirts of Spandau Ballet, coordinated with Milly Vanilly shorts.

I used to laugh a lot before, now I feel a bit sorry for you.