puntiniCAZpuntini

Hey, don't worry, I'll let you know. I just needed some relaxing Jazz like Live In Japan ;)... have you heard how Kenny Baron kills it on the Piano? Wow!!! :D

Yes Hal, it makes sense, I’m not saying it doesn’t make sense, I’m just saying that the explicit one makes MORE sense, that’s all. From that Pasolini quote, I understood something more or less, but I would have understood MORE if it had been explained well. / I don’t get myself because I imply too many things, maybe :) . That this album has reached an acceptable point, I implied from the very beginning. That the group members were part of my own “community of thought,” I’ve implied from the start; that even with symbols you achieve a goal, and you do it with much, much more STYLE than just saying it outright, I’ve implied from the beginning. I only say “They could have done more” :) / Then of course my first posts were about the attack, otherwise the discussion wouldn’t have come out; if I just said “they could have done more,” this review would have had at most 20 posts, instead it has 180. It’s the same point I always make, the best discussions (in my opinion, and based on my modest experience) arise when someone provokes, if we all start with accommodating statements, it ends too quickly, and we don’t get as far as we could with a couple more strong words. This cover, in terms of style, is stunning, it doesn’t suck, but I wanted to see what you all thought, which is why I said it sucks. Want to know another thing? I bought this album on November 2nd... really, I did buy it. But if I said that right away, I would’ve dampened everything too quickly; I wanted to create a bit of a talk show vibe. I know, I know I’m a son of a bitch, I know. ;)

tsèh... the uddue... tsèh... ;)

Just like when Zidane plays a normal game, Piccinini doesn't say, "Oh yes, but he played better than Paramatti," he says, "Zidane played badly." It's logical that it's always Zidane, who is a thousand times better than Paramatti, but as for Paramatti, he’s not worth spending words on. I only talk about great players; the rest is just background. I aim for the filet mignon, not the ground beef of third choice. There are also those who enjoy ground beef, well, worse for them. :))

Oh guys, but we really don’t understand each other. The APCs are still a musical group; they deserve my respect, and I can spend time thinking about where to find their weak point. The U2 are PURE SH*T, they are not a musical group, they don’t make music, they suck on all fronts, they are not worthy of my listening, they are not worthy of the time I could waste critiquing them. We’re on De-Baser, we’re talking about Music, not about U2. That the APCs have done better with this album than 1800000000000000000000000 other groups is something I agree with, but since they deserve respect, I expect them to rise to the top, not just exceed the average sh*t that’s out there. / Giò, do you really think I listened to the new U2??? :)

Another thing that is absolutely right, incredibly right: <<<<< Damn, but the APC are not the RATM! >>>>>> In fact, I won't buy the album from them, I even have the original singles from the RATM, who cares! :))))))))))

Here, barva, absolutely right! You've hit the nail on the head: <<< A singer who sings, who thinks about the style of singing (and in their spare time they ponder some political issues, etc.). >>> Exactly, since social commitment is A SERIOUS THING, SERIOUSLY SERIOUS, SERIOUSLY SERIOUS, HYPER SUPER SERIOUS, their spare time just isn't enough for me. These are serious matters; if you engage in them, you do it full-time, even if it’s just for one album. Then you can also make 187 albums of songs dedicated to pizza and pistachio ice cream, but when you take on A SERIOUS MATTER, YOU DO IT SERIOUSLY, it’s not something for spare time. It’s called social COMMITMENT, not social SPARE TIME. I know, I know I’m too extreme about these things, but I’m proud of it, olè. Alien Vs Predator 2, the return of the little exorcist.

With this album, they only found agreement from those who already thought like them, but they did not challenge the certainties of those who did NOT think that way. Here, we all understood, but the sheep who voted for Bush didn’t understand a damn thing; they saw a symbol of peace like so many times before.

Yes Hal, it's clear that you're from Sassari and you're used to speaking plainly. I'm talking about Effectiveness, but also about the Field of Action. Look at Pasolini, damn it, you and so many other people understood and received it, I for example, who in '74 was not even part of my father's nighttime projects, from that phrase there, I didn't understand a damn thing, and I'll tell you more, I KNEW NOTHING. I am a living example, therefore, of the fact that more could have been done; now, I don't have the means to understand what he meant, if he said who they were, and explained himself better, and gave me more references, through research I would have understood. What I'm saying is that by stating things abstractly, you please those who understand them, but you leave ignorant those who do not. Do you want to wake someone up who hasn't understood? Then explain it well to them. Very straightforward. I have to explain something about the Web; if I speak in precise terminology, I get to the point quickly, I put on a show, and those who know understand me and appreciate the speed with which I explained it, while my grandfather and my 14-year-old cousin, who loves Take That, don’t understand a damn thing, and they'll remain ignorant. Let's wake up even the grandparents and the silly girls, so we can truly get to a point.

Do you know a sculptor?... I was planning to have a half-bust of Zack made.