puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8169 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
The musical genre proposed by this record is a demanding one. I don't put a CD of this type in the player if I have to clean the house; this is a genre that I sit down and listen to, so it must be of high quality. I can also listen to a crappy Synth Pop CD, but I put it on while doing something else, as a soundtrack; that's a different thing. Why should I put this CD on instead of one by Bob Dylan or some other king of the genre? If I were only listening to this stuff, then fine, because sooner or later I'd run out of CDs and would have to settle for Brus, but since I listen to this and other things, when I listen to Folk Rock, I want to hear some Great Folk Rock, not Brus the king of mediocre. Final summary: THE CD does not deserve to be listened to attentively, and THE GENRE does not deserve to NOT be listened to attentively, therefore, crap.
Voto:
It’s nothing special, it’s STANDARD, it’s a blend of something someone else has already done, it has no particular merit, no remarkable instrumentals, it doesn’t use special sounds, it doesn’t experiment with anything worth mentioning. It’s STANDARD, average, the middle of the average. There’s so much beautiful music out there, why waste time with something average? Better to have a good CD of some “shitty” music genre than an average Folk Rock CD. Tell me what this brus has that someone else doesn’t, why does it deserve to be heard? For example, AC/DC always made the same stuff, but they had Angus. For example, The Clash couldn’t play for shit, technical skills were zero, but they managed to experiment and see beyond. What about Brus? Nothing, flatness, standard, mediocre.... crap, it sucks, because it’s average. I won’t waste time distinguishing between crap, acceptable crap, or passable crap... either I like it (and then I waste time figuring out how much I like it), or it’s crap. In the crap, they’re all crap, I can tell it’s better than Gemelli Diversi, but it’s not good enough to deserve a place with the best, so it’s crap. Even if it’s less crap than the others, it’s still crap, and I flush the chain, so I don’t see it anymore. Pucci, crap.
Voto:
Tell me where you live so I can move to your city, if they're all as normal as Stefani.
Voto:
Yes, I know it; the Rage even cover it (that's why I know it, I thought "if it's good for them, it'll be good for me too"), but I found it terrible. It's definitely the best of Brus, but even the best recipe for a quick stir-fry is still just a quick stir-fry. It's certainly a great album compared to what's played on MTV, but at best, it might be the least crappy of the crap corporation.
Voto:
They’ve mastered something to mess with you, Luca, I’m doing it too, it’s amusing to see the face of a friend who, between one Bob Dylan song and another, hears Entombed. There’s no Sexual Healing on this CD.
Voto:
Brus really sucks. Usually, you review great albums, you'll recover.
Voto:
Score 10, enlightened ones. (Paolo Ziliani Docet)
Voto:
Poop.
Voto:
But Pino, what do you know about what the record label asked her? Maybe the record label wanted a ballad like Don'T Speak and she delivered the groovy album, or maybe you’re right. But you don't know. I don't know either. But she’s got a great ass. Go for it.
Voto:
Here, I really like Superquark. The world is beautiful because it’s Gianni, Superquark is the scent of life. The ugliest cover of the Floyd, without a doubt, is Delicate Sound Of Thunder. What’s the connection? Nothing at all, but the Thunder is the scent of the commentary.