puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8167 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
I ordered them on Amazon, I'll let you know soon.
Voto:
Dear MassimoF, the technique doesn't cloud my judgment at all, but if you tell me that the Everest of rock doesn't even have half a solo, then I'll give it a one. I know how to separate the reviewer from the album, but since in this review the reviewer spews a mountain of nonsense, I give them a one. "So powerful, so clear, so haunting." ... but where? Powerful compared to what? The Righeira? ... for me this review deserves a one, separating the album from the reviewer, a flat one for both.
Voto:
Ajeje, regarding your last agreement, acoustically speaking (or if we want in its "folk version"), I've already said it might have its reasons. In that guise, it gets on my nerves precisely because of its Dylan-Style, but at least it does what needs to be done. I don’t like it, but it comes down to taste. I'm talking about this version of his, the pseudo-rock70, the one that offends true rockers, the one from Born In The USA, which is laughable for how useless and unmusical it is, pop garbage just as much as Gasolina and Chiwawa.
Voto:
Beautiful Pollack... American Vasco, you are absolutely right, I had never thought of that. I fully support your brilliant observation.
Voto:
Maybe they were wild... they are just a pain in the ass, boring, flat, and bland, never a spark, never anything that makes you go "wow, that's cool"... total flatness. In fact, their members are completely unknown, four idiots who can only hit a couple of notes just right to put together some pop-rock, very, very pop, Britney Spears... I love rock n roll.
Voto:
Ah Grass, I'll say it again for the umpteenth time, I hate Bruce even for his shameless recycling of Bob Dylan. It strikes me as really strange that you like this ranx-xerox, especially since you like Bob Dylan. I like serious pizza, not the poor imitations of Pizza-Hut.
Voto:
Tell me what’s musically interesting about this album, let’s hear it. Let’s reason based on the Zingarelli, the sound... where is it? eh?
Voto:
Massimof, Since it's a site that talks about music, those who make shitty music should be treated as such, right? If it were a site about humanities, I would have said well done, but since we're talking about music, reading "the Everest of rock n roll" on this album just makes you laugh out loud, and I’m telling you, we’re here to discuss, aren’t we?
Voto:
Moreover, Grass, first you tell me that music is and must remain as the definition in the Zingarelli... then you praise me, you fool, who INSTRUMENTALLY IS WORTH ZERO. There is an inconsistency in your reasoning; these are just words, there is no sound, so following your reasoning about Björk's review, this is NOT MUSIC.
Voto:
I don't consider the Velvet "ROCK"; they're on a very different level. They're labeled as rock because they emerged at a time when either you played blues, or jazz, or you were "rock," music for the youth. If they had come out in 2000, we would have all put them under alternative. But the Velvet were technically skilled; they did a thousand different things with a taste and an attitude that was unique, and that is technique, mastery of their instrument... while this album is a poor imitation of what was born under the Cream, under Jimi, the Zeppas, Black Sabbath, and DP. This is popular crap. If "I Love Rock N Roll" was sung by him instead of Spears, you would have said it was great; breaking down the two characters, they are identical; he’s just a gay guy showing off his ass, just like Britney.