puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7944 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
I analyze newly released albums without reading reviews at least six times a week, as is normal for someone who follows less mainstream genres; I don't see anything strange about it. When a Spiritual Beggars album comes out, it's not like within two days the internet is buzzing with reviews, is it? Is it that difficult? And what’s so challenging?... oh sorry, I didn't take into account the obvious limitations that god has gifted you.
Voto:
This stuff is already heavily recommended on TV, so what's the need to reiterate it here on Debaser? For what purpose? I've been seeing Bono on TV for 6 months now, why put it out here as well? If you only know U2 and Oasis, then avoid writing about it; read a bit more and look for some serious records.
Voto:
Pirlone, I repeat that I don’t have hives for those who sell, I’m listening to "Selling England By The Pound," which has sold more than this crap. You see, pirlone, you've just hit on exactly what I wanted to say: "there’s always some callow youth who needs educating." Indeed, does this seem like something to recommend to the youth? To me, it seems like pure shit; why do you even bother getting this record? There’s always some idiot who has a U2 CD in their car; they should buy Van Der Graaf Generator instead of this load of butter. Ah... now you also have the "forma mentis"... but who? You? You who wiggles to "Born in the USA"? You who mixes with the crowd of imbeciles with a lit lighter at Bruss’s live shows? Aren’t you ashamed? Your "forma mentis" deserves to be punished with labor camps, you and all your kind.
Voto:
What need is there to remember this album, only you know, it sold like crazy, U2 continue to sell like crazy, we always have them in our faces. What need is there? Are you also forgetful that you don’t remember Angel Of Harlem? I know this album by heart and I think it’s shit… was there really a need to dig it up, just a hidden gem buried in the sands of time… Massimof, you're really a die-hard accountant, huh, what is it: "under a million copies the album is crap"? Explain the evaluation terms well, do groupies and TV appearances count too, or do we sum up the value of the band members' cars?
Voto:
I caught him thanks to wwwhate, beautiful.
Voto:
A complete shit band all around, as people, as musicians, as the music produced, as fans, as everything. Seriously one of the worst bands in history, worth getting arrested for.
Voto:
<<<What upheaval took place between '69 and '70 in the minds of these budding musicians is something we cannot know,>>> How come? You already said it happened in their minds; in my opinion, they were still budding after that: they realized they were the only good guys of the entire '70s and got Robert Fripp to hook them up with the dealer. Other than that, I’d say the first drummer and the first guitarist were half-hearted; the lineup of Trespass is much tastier than the one originally put together. As for the rating, I agree and I’d also go with a two; it fits, even though I’ve only listened to this about ten times, all spread out over time. I remember it says little, but I don't really have a clear memory of what's in here.
Voto:
Colossal shit of oceanic proportions, let the rivers of diarrhea begin to flow.
U2 War
4 jul 05
Voto:
See, Ricky, it’s a matter of Greatness. When we talk about the F L O Y D, even if the point of the discussion is the belly of the members, it all becomes much, much more interesting than a recap of the uddue, which I haven’t even read but don’t hold it against me because it’s not your fault but Bono’s. And the Floyd didn't make history, they made music, which is different, you know. The Floyd, Interstellar Overdrive, not sandeibladisandei.
Voto:
That song is not by Fantomas, buy their CDs instead of shooting crap about every file you come across with the name Fantomas.