puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7942 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Blèch, I'm sorry to inform you that you've posted a review in a virtual space accessible to everyone, so you can't dismiss anyone. Next time, you should just hang the review on your bedroom door if you're not interested in what people think. Hal, I completely agree that Lord Blingdon is also a disgusting human being, the fact is that I can't stand Barry, so I choose the one that’s the least repulsive :D
Voto:
If my father dies and my mother marries a failed opportunist who, on top of that, tries to screw my maids in my garden, I would want him dead. Therefore, Bullingdon is a jerk, yes, but it was impossible to grow up healthy in that environment, so we should also empathize with the poor kid, right? Moreover, I get quite a thrill from the genuine hatred he feels, and I get even more excited by the bastard move of shooting despite Barry refusing. I think he's a great character; he feels such intense hatred that it ends up being likable.
Voto:
Damn Super, you know all the gossip, right...
Voto:
Nice Straight, I’ll catch it, thanks.
Voto:
I wrote more in my posts than you did in your review. If you want to condense 800 characters into a single "bad bad movie," good for you, but I wrote quite a bit, not just that. If you understand, great, but if you're an idiot, that's not my fault. Anyway, realize that your romantic-poetic style may not appeal to everyone; I personally find it absolutely detestable. Many might like it, but to me, pieces like "portraits of splendid landscapes or of men consumed by their many daily vices: hatred, gambling, thirst for power, fear... love. Moments captured by the light of a few candles, or softly colored and almost blended like pastels." seem like they come from an article in Donna Moderna. If you like them, good for you. But don’t say it’s nonsense, because there’s definitely "sense," let me explain it clearly: I don't share your interpretation of Kubrick's message, and I hate the style in which you described the film. Are you with me now?
Voto:
Ah, in Monterey he made this Album plus two covers, obviously Wild Thing and I think one by Chuck Berry, but I don't believe Johnny Be Good (he's done Johnny Be Good several times, but I don't think that time). However, I'm not completely sure, check the official website, until a little while ago there was a chronological list of his most important live performances complete with setlists.
Voto:
I have the latest version, the singles are included. I have almost everything from the Monterey Live, but it's scattered among the seven thousand posthumous box sets of Jimi. However, I didn't know that there was a full live recording; if I find it, I'll grab it. I really hope they release it on DVD. In the Jimi documentary, there's the end of the performance because, of course, they couldn't skip showing the dramatic finale of Wild Thing. It's been beautifully remastered in both color and sound, but seeing just 5 minutes makes you crave to watch the whole thing.
Voto:
How cute: the idiots are helping each other out. Come on El Guevo, you stopped writing because nobody paid attention to you and now you’re venting by giving low ratings to everyone, get a VAT number and open a recovery center for prudes, do something useful once in a while.
Voto:
You see, I don't have to explain anything to you; you're the one who wrote the review. I'm not the one who needs to explain the film. You expressed your point of view, and in my opinion, it's a superficial perspective articulated with prissy terms, and I think it sucks. Logically, the feeling is mutual.
Voto:
I feel sorry for them.