puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8166 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
I wrote those things calculating that Spike is a Nigga, and a nigga never gives up otherwise he wouldn't be a Nigga. There are people of color and there are Niggas, he is a NiggaToTheMaxx for sure. If Nanni Moretti had done it, I would fully agree with Piezzecore, since I ran out of the screening of "La stanza del figlio" out of despair, but being from Spike, I believe the message was: FUCK YOU, You Can't Kill Me.
Voto:
Well Joser, I can only tell you that in the file name it says 2005 (very little certainty) that the drummer is pounding... and is that veil where it should be? It's an amateur bootleg; basically, the guy who filmed it only focuses on the drummer, and quite closely too. Every now and then he turns the camera and catches the singer right in the face, but the bassist is never seen in half an hour and not much of the stage is visible either. But you should find it; I watched it last night, fresh off the download.
Voto:
Aeneas, whether dressed up or not, is always talking about pussy, and anyone who doesn't find it beautiful is gay.
Voto:
Whoever disagrees is gay. Another great obvious truth.
Voto:
I HAVE FOUND THE UNIVERSAL BEAUTY, I UNDERSTAND WHAT BEAUTIFUL IS INDEPENDENTLY OF TIME AND PLACE:... The Figa. It has been the same for thousands of years and is always beautiful. I am a genius, that's it, bow to my art.
Voto:
Sure, but be careful, saying "the idea of beauty has changed" is one thing (which I agree with because beauty is still at the center, even if in different forms), saying "art no longer concerns beauty" is another (neither a condemnation, nor a praise, nor even a matter of fact :D)
Name: josi_ | Date: 28/7/2005 | Rating: | Rating for the Album: >>>> Wow! Josi_ already said what I'm saying (Beautiful Josi_! :D)... by now it's like a chat, you lose messages between writing and sending :D
Voto:
In my opinion, Bogus, with the leap from "the search for beauty" to "the evaluation of beauty," you’ve entered a tunnel from which Aeneas will never let you escape :D, either you take one discussion at a time or we no longer talk about CCCP, and indeed it’s better that way, a nice one is fine.
Voto:
If we jump from "art no longer concerns itself with beauty" to "considering a work of art depending on the period it was made and the place it was made," I can't follow you; these are two completely different discussions, Bogus, I don't see the connection. For the first, I say no as I explained above; for the second, the obvious comes into play.
Voto:
Sure, I'm sure of that, Bogus. He can make it ugly and consider it ugly... but he does it on purpose, so he likes it, so he considers it beautiful, as I wrote above. If you do it, it’s because you want to do it; if you want to do it, it’s because you like it; if you like it, you consider it... beautiful. I agree on the matter of the thunderstorm, but that point is so obvious; I wouldn’t tell the Floyd of '78 that they don’t have the perfect synths of today. It seems clear to me, and therefore it can also be omitted, like "in my opinion"; if I write it, it’s "in my opinion," or like the "de gustibus" that’s automatically included when you say "it sucks." If we nitpick over these things, we’ll never finish. From beauty to temporal considerations, there’s a long way. Bogus, I’ve just thought of a fitting example: Ferretti does horrible things on purpose, but he likes them, so for him, they are beautiful; thus, he seeks his own idea of beauty. There is no universal beauty, and that seems clear to me too, so it can be omitted.
Voto:
But how can you say "it’s not said"? Bogus, if someone produces something, it’s because they like it; no one does something that they consider "ugly" on purpose. They might do it thinking that others find it ugly and they like it precisely for that reason, but they still like it, so they consider it beautiful.