puntiniCAZpuntini

Miles talks about it as the album where he compresses his "cool" idea and makes a sonic summary, before settling the accounts and opening a new era with BB. I've listened to it little and know it little; I remember well (but I could be mistaken) that there's a tremendous amount of "Fender bass" work (as they used to call it) by the then very young Dave Holland and quite a few melodies from McLaughlin and Corea. I should give it another good listen... but I'll wait for autumn, great review.

He has a fabulous voice, he’s really wasted. If he did something in the style of dEUS, we’d all be here giving a 5 like it’s nothing.

I've only seen Do The Right Thing once, I remember it being good but it's a very vague memory :D

You've strung together a huge sequence of nonsense; you didn't even say a "meh" on the technical side. Just to remind you, in this CD no one plays, but they use some plates. Your review doesn't make that clear; it's one of the worst from De-b.

Rewatched entirely yesterday, with extra bullshit and fluff, it lasts four hours and something, legendary. Plant with his musketeer look is more beautiful every time, Page with his beard gained 4 kg, but what I can never understand is: How does John Paul Jones, who in 1969 was said by all my friends to be "a real stud," become the imitation of Grandma Duck just 6 years later, that is, in TSRTS? It's a mystery on which modern plastic surgery is based and should be thoroughly investigated. PS the live for Danish TV is, for me, their best; they are in such great shape, the DVD should be bought just for those four songs (4 extended, right).

If Area had made "1978: Let's All Go Fishing," I would have written a review including 100 and one recipes for cooking seabreams, but since Area made "1978: Punkettoni, give us a blowjob," I wrote the review "1978: punkettoni, give him a blowjob," eh.

I believe the Stooges were NECESSARY, and I think some Hard Rock bands that created Punk were necessary as well; the Punk of '77, the London one, the one properly defined as PUNK, I believe served no purpose other than to create some pretty crappy music. Just look at the bands you mentioned; you have ONLY MENTIONED AMERICAN BANDS. This album was made by Area to throw shade on the London punk of '77, and I say they are right, and you all say it too, given that no one named even one band from the London scene of '77, and all you mentioned were the various offshoots, which, coincidentally, are all American. So I believe Area were right. Then, you all told me "you didn't talk about Area"... but what was I supposed to do? I transmitted the message of this album 100%, that seems sufficient to me. This is not a prog review that talks about punk; it's a review from 1978 that discusses the message contained in 1978, so whether you like it or not, the review is 100% relevant. Their message was filled with rage, and so is the review; in their album, they mock punk, and I do the same. So the review is very much there, and it is perfectly outlined along the lines of the album. You can tell me it disgusts you, but don’t come and say it has nothing to do with it, because that’s a ridiculous statement; it has everything to do with it, not my fault if they got pissed off, oh.

Yeah, yeah, bogus, you all say that, you simple-minded punks.

I say say, today I don't have time, maybe on Monday I'll copy and paste the comments :D. Then damn, this site is called Debaser... come on, it sounds like a punk site, it needed a nice disclaimer like this. I arrived and read Debaser and thought "site for idiot punks", then I read the reviews of LOR15 and said "site for idiot punks", then thank God I read those of Hal. (who will never post here, but deep down I think... heh heh heh...)

Here I didn't just want to piss people off, that's okay too, but everything I've written was thought by the Area and I think the same, I firmly believe that punk is just a simplification or childishness of Rock.