puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8165 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Why? You’re spouting galactic nonsense talking about gods, I just pointed out the nonsense in your writing and your vote, and then yes, I also threw in the shit about the offense. But the gravity of a piece of crap should be assessed based on its reference, and I was referring to you, while you were referring to the Cream: which is more serious? Who asked for it? Are you sure about what you’re saying or did they misfire your charge?
Voto:
...isn't it worse than a fool?
Voto:
But do you know what it means exactly?
Voto:
... oh no. No notes.
Voto:
Mh...
Voto:
wow
Voto:
I also think it ended in '72 (The Wall excluded), but he did such enormous things that they are enough until 2015: he still has 10 years of free devotion, living off the earnings earned in the field.
Voto:
It's logical that it's a personal opinion, so what? What changes? How does it work, if it's a personal opinion, can't anyone tell you that they think it's a huge load of bullshit? So what are you doing here, giving unquestionable personal opinions? The episodes are dated, but they wanted to do Blues; it's like taking a Jazz record from 1960 onwards and giving it a 3 because it feels outdated... what does that have to do with it being outdated? Do you judge Blues based on innovation? That doesn’t seem logical to me at all, it strikes me as a rather ignorant and middle-school level point of view. Then with Clapton, "less famous" means "less famous," it doesn't mean "the last unknown jerk who showed up," it means "less famous than the other two," but do you know who Jack & Ginger were back in the day? Clapton was the new promise, but Jack & Ginger (and I repeat: especially Ginger) were already established musicians long before the kid Eric. That your load of nonsense hasn’t been very appreciated seems pretty obvious from the comments and ratings; stick to Mario Mensola because you look better that way, avoid touching groups with a significance that you can't handle. And this is my personal opinion (I specified, are you happy?).
Voto:
A little bit, yes, but comparing them to Pink Floyd is quite a stretch. Bruce always stated that his intent was to form a band of modern conservatives; he wanted to ferry the Blues into the world of electric music. It never even crossed his mind to create innovative music: they were three monsters of their instruments (especially Baker, the first real powerhouse on drums, as well as the first to use the "rock" grip on the sticks) who just enjoyed playing their music, without too much studio fuss. Plus, they always let others handle the production without meddling too much, just look at Felix Pappalardi who turned this album into something much more "ear-friendly" than it originally was. In their live shows, you could say there’s psychedelia: songs with tripled durations due to 5-minute solos, furious drum interludes on very relaxed songs, and so forth. But anyway, comparing this album to the Floyd or Zappa is a colossal nonsense. Giving it a 3 is ignorant; even if one of their studio albums is worth a sixteenth of their live performances, a 3 isn’t a score for Cream.
Voto:
A trend that has lasted for a while now, 10 years of career, and relative fashion. But don't trends fade quickly?