puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8091 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Teesorinoo, look, you've misunderstood: what I said was neither a complaint nor a judgment, but the complete opposite. The point of all this is that there's nothing to complain about. But above all, you're the one passing judgments, since you use the horrible word "objectively." There is nothing objective about this. If you really believe what you're saying is objective, in my opinion, you have serious mental issues. If you took this as a complaint when, in fact, it’s the opposite, I think you have serious mental problems. And that doesn’t mean that you objectively have them, because there’s nothing objective at all; however, in my opinion, you’ve got a big problem, bro.
Voto:
Even if something makes a bit of sense, even if it's far-fetched, I wrote it: the one about the Muff, I really didn't get it.
Voto:
It's not at all a constructive criticism; it's just a hassle-for-the-sake-of-it.
Voto:
Don't worry, the vote on the record is right :D
Voto:
I wanted to conclude with: Rubicondo. Because Lukin wanted to say it but I'm a son of a b*tch and I'm stealing it from him.
Voto:
I didn't understand the clarification about the Muff. He has never used them, he doesn't play with anyone who uses them, and he’s not part of that scene. It's like specifying that in a Run DMC record, you won't find an 1800s church organ. It's not that "he was also hired by Vai"... his career starts there. Without Vai, there’s no Townsend; it’s not a collaboration, it’s "talent scouting." Too many repetitions that fall into redundancy (damn, I really wanted to say that): "Personally, I find it really personal" followed by "QUASI chill-out that starts very quietly and offers QUASI ethereal atmospheres"... in short, everything here is almost, and nothing is in itself. Besides the fact that you’re the first I hear saying this is the best of Devin; sure, everyone has their own opinion, but I've never heard anyone say that. You’re good, but you don’t apply yourself; in life, you need to go beyond your nice braids. I’d say it’s better for you to stick to the childish territory of God & Glam from the '80s; it suits you more, especially for the braids.
Voto:
The most beautiful of the Masada that I have heard.
Voto:
Beautiful, but I think the Jaco era is better. Not just for Jaco, the others seem more inspired as well, and the group's chemistry is more cohesive. This is indeed a 5-star album, but from Black Market to 8:30, it's a 6. With a Heavy Weather that I believe is beyond the score.
Voto:
Well, Brus is Rock... but it's also true that he’s one of the first revivalists done incredibly poorly. Zero innovation and poorly made, boring, predictable, and absurdly trivial. Then I see many who appreciate the folk side, but I find the Rock so disgusting that I can’t hear the Folk without feeling annoyance. Antmo: yes, this album is one of the most pompous, annoying, elaborate snooze-fests I’ve ever heard, very much trying to be trendy. I like pompousness when it's exaggerated, as in this case. Few people can make albums like this; there are so many ideas and tons of technique, and that’s a combination you don’t come across often.
Voto:
I believe we think in the same way :D, it's just a matter of names. I have friends who consider everything and anything to be Rock; I am more selective and meticulous. Already the Pink Floyd, I don't see them as rock: too stretched out, too electronic, too snobbish. Psychedelia I think is the right word. For me, rock died with the MC5 and the Velvet Underground, the kind that, as Easy rightly says, was full of "hedonism, humility, pure communicativeness." I don’t see Slint as a rebirth of rock, but rather as one of the many new pages. I’m not one of those who use Rock to mean "modern music"; rock is part of modern music, let’s even say it’s the main component, but it can’t be used for everything, otherwise it loses its meaning. Look at Kraut-Rock... what do Tangerine Dream have to do with Rock? :D