puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8163 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
<<< And I (out of necessity) "subjectively" tell you that "objectively" it’s funny >>> This sentence doesn’t make sense, that’s why I’m telling you there’s some issue, bro.
Voto:
And finally, the standard of judgment: sorry, but the review is signed by me. It’s not signed on behalf of the "world collective of great truths." That is my thought, made with my own standard of judgment. How could I possibly write and use someone else’s standard of judgment? Don’t you realize that it’s a contradiction? Whose standard of judgment were you hoping for, that of the Holy Madonna special guest The Angels in Column? Please explain to me because my indisputable standard of judgment can’t grasp it. Besides the fact that, since I wrote something hoping it would be commented on, the word "indisputable" is complete nonsense. I stated my opinion precisely to discuss my point of view, so it is the exact opposite of "indisputable," right? If I wanted it to be "indisputable," I would have written it on a blog without the possibility of a reply, wouldn’t you agree? I look forward to your responses, I’m always keen on comedy.
Voto:
Ah, the artists I included are just examples. You know, it's a bit difficult to fit all the deserving artists in music history into 30 lines. Besides, lists are pretty boring. If you want a list, go to the land registry; here, at most we throw out discussion prompts. If you find the prompt incomplete, then complete it yourself. It seems pretty obvious to say that we're missing artists: of course we are, but so what?
Voto:
Teesorinoo, look, you've misunderstood: what I said was neither a complaint nor a judgment, but the complete opposite. The point of all this is that there's nothing to complain about. But above all, you're the one passing judgments, since you use the horrible word "objectively." There is nothing objective about this. If you really believe what you're saying is objective, in my opinion, you have serious mental issues. If you took this as a complaint when, in fact, it’s the opposite, I think you have serious mental problems. And that doesn’t mean that you objectively have them, because there’s nothing objective at all; however, in my opinion, you’ve got a big problem, bro.
Voto:
Even if something makes a bit of sense, even if it's far-fetched, I wrote it: the one about the Muff, I really didn't get it.
Voto:
It's not at all a constructive criticism; it's just a hassle-for-the-sake-of-it.
Voto:
Don't worry, the vote on the record is right :D
Voto:
I wanted to conclude with: Rubicondo. Because Lukin wanted to say it but I'm a son of a b*tch and I'm stealing it from him.
Voto:
I didn't understand the clarification about the Muff. He has never used them, he doesn't play with anyone who uses them, and he’s not part of that scene. It's like specifying that in a Run DMC record, you won't find an 1800s church organ. It's not that "he was also hired by Vai"... his career starts there. Without Vai, there’s no Townsend; it’s not a collaboration, it’s "talent scouting." Too many repetitions that fall into redundancy (damn, I really wanted to say that): "Personally, I find it really personal" followed by "QUASI chill-out that starts very quietly and offers QUASI ethereal atmospheres"... in short, everything here is almost, and nothing is in itself. Besides the fact that you’re the first I hear saying this is the best of Devin; sure, everyone has their own opinion, but I've never heard anyone say that. You’re good, but you don’t apply yourself; in life, you need to go beyond your nice braids. I’d say it’s better for you to stick to the childish territory of God & Glam from the '80s; it suits you more, especially for the braids.
Voto:
The most beautiful of the Masada that I have heard.