puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7969 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
No, I have never written anything like that, nor do I think so. I'm pasting what I wrote above <<< I wrote "he said it all," meaning 60/70 as a style, not a date. >>> But do you read the comments? Style, not date, style. ONE style, not a thousand, just one style indicated for convenience with a date to understand each other, do you get it?
Voto:
PLIN PLON: I heard that the new one is already online. PLIN PLON. (rating for the album in the career, I don't have this G.Hits)
Voto:
Luke Skywalker lets me know that he loves Dream-Slo-Fi and that as soon as you drop an album, you need to let him know right away. Yoda is eager to remix everything in a "Drill N Drum With Bass" style, so if you give him a heads-up, prepare everything in advance and release a double for the limited edition.
Voto:
<<< Well, you also agree that (in the first case) if you mean Rock as "just that" Rock, then it can be said with reasonable accuracy that it's dead, right? >>> Yes, it can be said, and I say it, harshly. "A geenoo non va molto a geeneeo" (what a togo I am, right?) but this idea resonates with me. Maybe in 1000 posts we'll find a galactic consensus and finally Luke Skywalker will be able to share his thoughts.
Voto:
And today is Matteo Brutal's second birthday, so it must be emphasized that Cannibal Corpse don't play Brutal but Brutal-Grind in the early days and Brutal-Death in the later ones. The first one who says thrash without the H goes to the blackboard.
Voto:
Bon Josi_, the meaning is the first thing you said and with which (you say it, right? :D) you agree. Just know that I am an anti-scruffian, fussy, millimeter-delimiting person. Long live Brutal-Death-Ghotic-Non Wave-British-Metal... folk. A bit of thrash too, but never Doom.
Voto:
Amorinooo, you keep insisting on pinning everything on a damn name. You said it yourself <<< Music transforms, shifts its horizons, rock will be called by another name. >>> I’m one of those who, for convenience, calls it something else because it’s different from what came before. If you want to keep calling it the same way, good for you, but that doesn’t mean I’m wrong for using nicknames and/or derivations. For me, what you call Rock 80 is Glam, Shoegaze, Hardcore, Thrash Metal, Revival, Electronic, Synth Pop, Rap. What you call Rock 90 is Stoner, Trip Hop, Drill N Bass, Techno, Drum N Bass. Just because you group everything under rock because you like it that way doesn’t mean a damn thing. I’m not flipping any pancakes here; I’ve repeated the same things to you for 800 posts. Tell me where I’ve changed my line of thought, come on. You’re the attacker, not me. You’re the one who wants to prove something, not me. For 800 posts now, I’ve been saying the same things: you’re misunderstanding a damn name, call it whatever you want, but the reasoning doesn’t change. If you’re interested in continuing, let’s keep going; I find it entertaining too, oh.
Voto:
I remind you, however, that this is a review of an album. It is not a treatise on modern music. The point was to say that this is a well-made modern Rock album, not to claim "wow, rock is dead." I included the "discovery of hot water" as a joke. You always overlook this small but important detail in your critique.
Voto:
And I’ll say it again: if you admit that you haven't heard this record, you’ll look better.
Voto:
It's crystal clear that the 60s/70s rock has said it all. Grazialcaz. I find this phrase very similar to "60s/70s rock has already said everything it could say in the field of innovation; this is logical and evident for quite some time." Exactly the same. So, excuse me, since we’re saying the exact same thing precisely the same, where’s the outburst? Explain it to me because I really don’t get it; it seems exactly the same to me.