puntiniCAZpuntini

Just one last thing: << I'm not entirely sure that someone who loves Gilmour and is willing to spend 60 euros to see him play has to be Gaggio >>. I've never met a convinced Gilmourian who isn't one. I love Gilmour too, but I'm not a Gilmourian, the type "the best of the Floyd." From those, I notice every time that not a single one escapes. Gilmour feels very much like the "part of the Floyd that pleases the gaggio."

Damn, the bell has rung for the end of recess. Sandwich & Mortadella Bless You All, especially Josi_ who is in favor of fat (because he’s not a gaggio, obviously).

You would have gone... but your unconscious non-gaggiezza meant that you weren't there. They are cosmic magnets that go beyond our thought, Roberto from the TV sales always says, it's not just pizza and figs.

So now the new Tool album is coming out, I’ve seen people ruin their eyes looking for esoteric references in a 150x150 .jpg that captures a detail from the new cover. Then of course, there are also the non-gaggies, and the ones in between like me and superintruder, who are gaggi-inside but don’t show it. Gilmour could go on tour playing a Fisher Price guitar, and people would go saying “wow, so experimental!”

But you see what I mean? You’re not a poseur, and you didn't go there. They are poseurs; coincidentally, they were there. The Gilmourian people are poseurs; I’ve thought that for a long time. Beyond Gilmour. How poseurish the Tool people are, for example. And I like both a lot, the artists. The fans, much less.

No. They say that I said this in general. I am referring to this, at that place on that date, period. We always reach absolute cosmicism, never pinning down a precise point. It's not a valid dogma every time.

"Are you by any chance publishing an essay on the subject?" No, it's with a G: Gaggio, not Saggio.

<< Do you realize that you are being offensive? >> Of course. << Do you realize that you don’t know anything about me? >> Of course, I wrote it to you as well: "It seems to me that you are a gaggio, from what you write. Maybe you're not, but I have to stick to the material I have." And I reiterate: it seems to me, based on what I read. I can’t be sure, because I don’t know you. As I wrote before, word for word. << And that your pseudo adolescent outbursts are ridiculous? >> Why pseudo adolescent? Tell me, tell me. << That you are posturing as a superman and judging me based on two posts? >> No, no, no, I judged your two posts, I did not judge you based on the two posts. Well, as above: "it seems to me, based on what I read. I can’t be sure, because I don’t know you." See, you start from a pre-set assumption? << It’s your very own obsession (copied from Fight Club in the references to IKEA, by the way). >> No, look, the anonymous guy from F.C. had the luxury ones; he didn’t like the ones from IKEA. << Your thinking as a free man is imbued with the same clichés of my supposed rigid thinking. >> Me, thinking as a free man? And where did I write that bullshit? << Judging 2400 people and a tour based on ticket prices is something only a kit man would do... for me. >> No, there are many reasons, starting with the fact that the artist has been a bit of a pain in the ass. << Can you explain to me what gaggio means? >> Take a look in the mirror (no korn related).

<<< Commenting on a concert you didn't see while calling those who did fools. Subtly. >>> No, I didn't comment on anything. No, it wasn't subtle at all, but quite specific: you went = what a fool. << Aren't you expecting any reaction? >> I don't expect anything, I just read the posts. << So, let's talk about the shit of showbiz >> What a drag, that conversation has been had 800 times, go ahead but I'm pulling out of a discussion that's been covered in 2000 reviews. In summary: see, you keep starting from your old assumptions instead of calculating one point at a time? It's all the fault of the little bag of screws you have at your disposal, you're missing the expansion washers.

But why, did I comment on the concert? When? Did I happen to say "what an awful concert," "I didn't go because of this and that..."? No. I only say that, for various reasons, that place was full of gaggi. And you keep confirming it to me, since I have yet to read a non-gaggio comment from anyone who was there. Understatements can only be calculated if you know the person; you don’t know me, and you can’t know what I imply. Just as I can’t do that with you. It seems to me that you’re gaggio, from what you write. Maybe you're not, but I have to stick to the material I have. You look for understatements, believing you understand 200 implied words from a single statement... you’re convinced I want to comment on a concert when I haven’t done so nor will I, nor am I interested or will I ever be. There’s no solid point in the discussion: it’s just chitchat. It’s that you kit-man need solid pillars of thought to base logic on; being in a kit, you lack flexibility. You’re made to one size, and beyond that, you don’t go. Try adding one more shelf: you’ll see how nice it is. (maybe also a satin stainless steel handle, it’s a little gem)