puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7909 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Hi Skinos (because Dama sounds bad), they gave me the sweeks but I still haven't heard them well, it's definitely not summer stuff. Constellation and similar ones bloom in the fall. Moon, you excite me when you play the tough macho.
Voto:
MP, irony is a subject for supreme minds; you can't expect everyone to understand. An average mind, perhaps, instead of focusing on the rankings, would read the reviewed groups and, finding not even a single punk or similar, would get there. An average, though. The supreme one understands at once, the average one gets there, the inferior remains stuck, on the roadside; next to the test of nine.
Voto:
Wall, I'm sorry but I've never been an editor, I don't have time to read others' reviews, let alone correct them. I stand on the right because editors have taste. Sanjuro, I can't improve on perfection. Dump, your last comment is quite hilarious, thank you. Moon, trim your sideburns.
Voto:
The speech closes because it's not that they've added little; on the contrary, they have, as I repeat: minimized. It's an involution, not a revolution. The stoner has added to the Blue Cheer. The Dalek have changed and distorted the stuff of L. Poets, leaving only the rhymes, but in completely different metrics and timings. It's the same in all genres except for punk. That's why I consider it pointless and it pisses me off. Nice for Moon, nice for Pollack, and nice also for superintruder, which I hadn't seen. The test of nine is on the wet beach. Side of Lino loves you all.
Voto:
Mastodon & Carnage would sound exactly the same, because in terms of music and sound, that stuff had already been written, made, and explored by people like the Stooges & MC5. Punk, in terms of composition and sound, added nothing; it only minimized. Since Mastodon & Carnage are anything but minimal (both in terms of sound setup and everything else), they took absolutely nothing from punk. I listen to everything except punk. It’s not a matter of open-mindedness, that’s for sure.
Voto:
Sanjuro, I repeat for the umpteenth time: I did not talk about academic technique. I couldn't care less about academic technique. I didn't specify "technique in playing an instrument." I don't give a damn if someone can play an instrument. El Producto is a million times more technical than what the Muse produce, and yet El Producto does rap while Muse plays guitar, piano, and all that crap. If it amuses you to pretend that I adore academic technique, go ahead. But that's not the case. And about punk: I consider it unworthy from '78 to today. Two or three albums are okay, the rest is useless. Jim, hey, I wanted to remind you that you're already in a happy hour, and living costs half as much.
Voto:
Ah, Pratella Russolo & Marinetti were technically skilled about as much as the entire current indie scene multiplied by you. You're a bit of an idiot if you consider musical technique to be just knowing how to play an instrument. Trent Reznor, for example, is technically outstanding, but as far as I know, he mostly plays the triangle.
Voto:
It's not just a matter of technical mastery. Besides, I don’t think they even went to an academy. Ideas come first, then you need to set them to music. There are those who can do it, and those who have more ideas than they can put into practice, and there are those who can only execute things written by others because they lack compositional imagination. Technical execution is only part of the discussion, but it is essential. Whether you use a guitar, a turntable, a PC, or a hand blender. It's not about playing 8 million notes; it's about fitting them together properly.
Voto:
The point is that with 4 words and 2 synonyms you can't write the Divine Comedy. It needs a broader vocabulary. With four chords, you are very instinctive but also very assimilable to others. Take 10 songs by ATDI at the two-minute mark, within two seconds you've recognized which piece it is. Take 10 songs by Volta at the same timing, you'll never know it's them, because a piece contains 800 passages and 24 different styles. It's not just about playing more chords, but fitting them together well. In my opinion, it's not a different way of conceiving music, because even at 20, Zavala didn't have the culture and preparation to do these things. This is high-level stuff, not comparable to what any guy with a guitar bought at the farmer's market can pull out in a garage. You can find songs that make you headbang by the dozen, but compositions of this type are much rarer. It's not the number that counts, but how you fit them together. You can fit 4 in 16 ways; after 16 pieces, you're already recycling. 80 chords in 6400, you've got material for a while. They are the living example that punk can be done even as a kid; progressive, of any kind, takes a bit more. Playing punk is like having a driver's license; playing prog is like being a GP. "Uncle Fripp, Uncle Fripp, will you teach me to play the guitar? ... When you grow up, little strummer, when you grow up..."
Voto:
I also forgot an "n" when conjugating the magnificent verb sottolineare.