puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7902 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
"First you say that 'he started in pole position' and then you say that they gave him a shitty album to review." No, that’s not true. I absolutely did not write that they gave him a shitty album to review; rather, I wrote that they gave him an album that "they wouldn't give to just any asshole." Before you write, learn to read. "publishing his memoirs" was a mistake but also no, No, it’s no mistake, it’s just bullshit. Just like that, bullshit. "his reviews blended real life and music criticism if you didn’t know..." And what does that have to do with it? They are still reviews that were published at the time, not any memoir book. There’s a difference. "[...] OR DO YOU WANT TO DENY THIS TOO?!" Oh, I wrote it to you at the end: I like bangs. Learn to read, part two. "I DON'T CARRY the name of Lester Bangs...I use a parody of his," Oh really? Just stop it.
Voto:
"Then someone said that Lester Bangs was an insult to the world of music criticism. 30 years later everyone is praising him and publishing his memoirs..." What bullshit. Lester Bangs debuted in the most important music magazine on the planet, reviewing an album like Kick Out the Jams by the MC5, which they wouldn't have let just any jerk review. So no one is reevaluating a damn thing about Bangs, considering he immediately started in pole position. Furthermore, you said another eminent bullshit, since they never published a damn memoir by Bangs, just selections of his writings previously published in other music journals. If anything, and this is the third bullshit, after his death many reevaluated him in the opposite way, noticing the immense nonsense he occasionally spouted. In fact, the "Diva" is still very much in vogue, in spite of him and his predictions that he would throw down, shocked like a llama at 4:00 AM. Let's be clear: I like Bangs too, I just wanted to point out the nonsense you say about the character whose name you carry. Shut up."
Bongzilla Stash
14 nov 06
Voto:
And you de-blob, how’s the little base going for you?
Bongzilla Stash
14 nov 06
Voto:
How beautiful, on my reviews we are always in letizzzzzia and harmony. Everyone. Everyone... except for geeno, poor thing, who doesn't understand. Look geeno, how much we love you! See that I can speak on behalf of the community? I know we all care about you, so don’t lose the thread! < - << - << in the only sideburn that is visible, you can clearly see the black of the hair. If it were shaved, you wouldn't see the color of the hair. Shaved comes from the verb "rasare," which means to remove the part of the hair that protrudes from the skin. If nothing is protruding, you can't see the hair and consequently the color. >>. So, you need to explain to me how you can talk about shaved hair when the color is visible. Come on now, you can do it: explain. >> Come on, come on, up up. >>
Bongzilla Stash
14 nov 06
Voto:
Should I use Derivare, and not Venire? (I still have my evening middle school diploma, you know. I learned Italian with the synonyms from Word 97) For Geeno: < - << - << in the only visible little beard, you can clearly see the black of the hair. If it were shaved, you wouldn't see the color of the hair. Shaved comes from the verb rasare, which means to remove the part of the hair or the hair that protrudes from the skin. If nothing protrudes, you can't see the hair and consequently the color. >>. So, you need to explain to me how you can talk about shaved hair if you can see the color. Come on, you can do it: explain. >> Come on, come on, hurry up. >>
Bongzilla Stash
14 nov 06
Voto:
Here, Josi_ is more trained than I am. Geeno, sorry if we bothered you. Just pretend nothing happened, and explain: < - << - << in the only area that’s visible, you can clearly see the black of the hair. If it were shaved, you wouldn’t see the hair color. Shaved comes from the verb to shave, which means to remove the part of the hair or hair that protrudes from the skin. If nothing is protruding, you can't see the hair and consequently the color. >>. So, you need to explain to me how you can talk about shaved hair if the color is visible. Come on, you can do it: explain. >> Come on, come on, up up. >> Come on, let's go.
Bongzilla Stash
14 nov 06
Voto:
Ah no, now I understand. Pietro was discussing the phrase itself, so even if there was reasoning about common usages behind the mistake, the phrase still remained - and remains - incorrect. It's been a while since I last debated with him, and I forgot how the issue works. Forgive me, Pietro, but as you can see, I quickly get back in shape.
Bongzilla Stash
14 nov 06
Voto:
Well, you don't say "shaved hair" when you actually shave your hair; you don't "shave" it. At least, I've always known that "to shave" is used for razors, and "to clip" for clippers. So, am I starting off on the wrong foot? For Geeno: < - << - << in the only sideburn that is visible, you can clearly see the black of the hair. If it were shaved, you wouldn't see the color of the hair. "Shaved" comes from the verb "to shave," which means to remove the part of the hair or hair that sticks out from the skin. If nothing is sticking out, you can't see the hair, and consequently, the color. >>. So, you need to explain to me how you can talk about shaved hair if the color is visible. Come on, you can do it: explain. >> Come on, come on, go go. >>
Bongzilla Stash
14 nov 06
Voto:
Geenoo, don't lose the thread of the conversation, okay? Let me summarize: << - << in the only sideburn that is visible, you can clearly see the black of the hair. If it were shaved, you wouldn't see the color of the hair. Shaved comes from the verb "rasare," which means to remove the part of the fur or hair that extends beyond the skin. If nothing extends, you can't see the hair, and consequently, the color. >> So, you need to explain to me how you can talk about shaved hair if the color is visible. Come on, you can do it: explain. >> Come on, come on, cheer up. >>
Bongzilla Stash
14 nov 06
Voto:
And for shaving, what is used, sparse? But sparse is not synonymous with "not dense"?