puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8009 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Luciferatu is the embryo of this. It has nice riffs and great sounds, but loses a lot in imagination. Too stoner-standard, which makes it nice but nothing more. Of course, if you really like stoner, you’ll listen to it very gladly. Hi Kappa, it’s always a pleasure ("what" is "a pleasure," you choose :D).
Voto:
<< It would be enough for the "known" people on the site to write a measly list of albums to listen to. That’s all... without the need for reviews, just the trust "caused" by the experience and knowledge of the users... >> Yes. It would be enough. But we also like to write every now and then, so you'll have to put up with us, I'm sorry. << To be rated with the highest vote, it has to express something more than this and not just rely on "reputation." >> I thought it was nice to highlight the extreme similarity between winemaking and music production in many parts of the world. There’s the wine of the Rhine and Krautrock, there’s champagne and militant French rap, there’s sangria and Spanish ska-core... I don't know typical Argentine wines, but I know the stoner from the pampas. The definition above of DOC is that from the dictionary; just change Uva to music and vino to albums, and the game is done. For me, that was enough to write a review; if it wasn't enough for you, that’s fine too.
Voto:
Jim, the two sentences plus the images this time. I included the prairie, the dragonauts in a '70s pose, and two Dragonauts laughing wide-eyed from the ganjah of the pampas. Stonerissimo :D // Fidia, I didn't take it as a provocation, in fact, I agreed with you. Right now, with 90,000 reviews a day, it’s a bit difficult to grasp the initial spirit of the project. It's not that it's worse now; it’s just different.
Voto:
<<if it had been written by any other new user, this review would be relegated to the bottom of the right reviews and filled with obscene comments...>> Yes, obviously. That's exactly what we were talking about, about interaction over time. If someone is new, they haven't interacted, we don't know them, they first need to introduce themselves.
Voto:
Ah well, yes. Four words are worth as much as four hundred that go deep. I'm all for Valetudo, both as a sport and as a writing style. Lewis, you should like the Dragonauta. If you know Los Natas, we're more or less in that ballpark, but the Drago indulge more in notes, breaks, and prog-like variations (I wrote “like,” okay).
Voto:
Exactly, the interaction. Many users of this site, for me, can also write just 4 words and indicate the genre, and I already know what the record is like and if I will like it. And this happens quickly; it’s not like it takes years of exchanges. Another example, I know very well that, even if we have very similar tastes, this record won’t appeal to psychopompe the way it does to me. Due to the production, sound, and bass & drum setup that drives me crazy but resonates less with him. On the other hand, it’s a record very much in the style of Moonchild or Birobiro. Oh, maybe it’s just me having too much memory :D
Voto:
Patton arrived when the album was already finished; he wrote the lyrics in ten days and laid them over the tracks. The album was released a month after Michele's arrival. According to him and Gould, they only tweaked two or three "hooks," either delaying or advancing them to sync with the lyrics. I adore Patton, but before '91-92 he was just a singer, nothing more. A guy with an incredible vocal gift, but not the Genius he later became. Patton is present in Angel Dust; in this album, he's just an overly excited kid playing with the greats. It's a fabulous album, but especially thanks to one of the best rhythm sections of the '80s: Gould & Puffy. The bass and drums on this album are exceptional, no exaggeration. What ruins your review is that "less interesting" remark about War Pigs. I mean, War Pigs. Moreover, it’s played so well that later on, Ozzy "signed" Puffy to play with him.
Voto:
I was telling Fidia, the comments from others weren't there yet. Thanks for the link, Sfascia.
Voto:
Well, yes and no. Right now, I agree with you, but a few years ago there was a lot, a lot, a lot less "seriousness," so writings like this weren't "provocative," but just "carefree interludes." I've always written like this since I read "Resist" by the Kosheen, written by G. That was three years ago. If a bunch of idiots have come along wanting to teach us how to use this site, well, that's their problem. I continue to consider them "carefree interludes" through which I recommend an album, without overthinking it. Anyway, I repeat: right now, yes, you're right. It's just that I don't do it on purpose; I’ve become like this.
Voto:
Ah, one more thing: sincere compliments to the creator of "Folk Apocalittico," I'm still laughing...