puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8161 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
I believe it exceeds two hundred or so (including also the things done on the fly, like this one), Hal. Oh, anyway: well Hal! :-)
Voto:
At your age, are you still doing track by track of the first Zeppa? Wow, what an idea! Strongly innovative and revolutionary, I would say. It’s 2007, and the airship runs aground in Milano Marittima.
Voto:
<< I am absolutely outraged by the avalanche of nonsense written on this topic that started as a review of an album by a great (and get it in your head, he will always be GREAT) artist like Michael Jackson. As a fan, and proud of it, I think this... beyond the fact that we must respect each other's opinions (I think he’s innocent, you don’t, fine with me), true respect lies in avoiding offending an artist that someone admires and respects. If you like Britney Spears, I won’t go around saying “oh yes, that little slut who has kids and then goes to have fun with Paris Hilton,” I would at most say I don’t really like her as a person or as an artist, but it’s all subjective… I always realize that when it comes to Michael, it’s always the same music, which is why I don’t even bother anymore trying to convince people who don’t even know what it means to think objectively, but are only capable of talking with insults and jabs. I can only say think what you want, think MJ is a pedophile, a rapist, a racist, whatever you want, even say that musically he means nothing to you... but at least be intelligent or at least a little mature when it comes to discussing something for what it is (in this case, a review) and avoid mixing the artist with the man… we’re talking about an album, so just express your comments about this damn album; otherwise, just shut up because I’m fed up with hearing arguments on skin whitening, racism, pedophilia, and various other stuff. I ask you this out of respect for me and for all the fans of this artist… we respect you, you respect us. And with that, I'm done. >> Human Case Now!
Voto:
Is that all? What a disappointment. I agree with Malloy, as far as I remember LSD was extracted from Ergot, that is, the normal rye infected by a fungus. And the Smurfs, all with their hands in the air.
Voto:
Thank you :-). The micropoints are over, but I can tell you that RATM are reuniting, they'll be playing at the Coachella Festival this April. A rather sad thing, or maybe not. It made me a bit sad, in fact I ran out of micropoints. Now I'm going to read the crime scene, so the laughter will help everything rise.
Voto:
What’s the review of the crime scene, Antò? It’s not like you guys should be the only ones laughing, oh.
Voto:
HILARIOUS COVER.
Voto:
Thank you. I laughed so hard. Really, I laughed a lot. I thought it wasn't loading the others, but instead, I laughed so hard. Thank you.
Voto:
The murder committed by Norton. The Brother dies in a standard way, the handsome one does it Norton. Come on, it was easy.
Voto:
The man killed by slamming against the edges is - in the film - Professor Giordani, played by Glauco Mauri, and not a policeman. >> Ooohhh... finally someone who knows the film. Everyone pretends to be connoisseurs, correcting the nonsense, and they don’t even realize when they’re being mocked. They even start with "<< A LITTLE ATTENTION PLEASE :::: >> ". Oh sure, plenty of attention. Good job Velluto, you’ve uncovered the culprit :) - The real nonsense of the film is just one: the bricked-up wall is bricked up perfectly, by professionals, invisible, with flawless plaster... and a corpse inside in plain sight. To brick up a window, you have to do it from the inside. You can’t carry bricks up a ladder and you think you’re going to build scaffolding to brick up a window. And you think that even if you bricked it up from outside with scaffolding (and then plastered it later), you wouldn’t notice there’s a dead guy inside. Bah, you’re just trivial opponents :D - I was disappointed in Enea; I would have never expected it from him... (damn)