puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7949 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
(PS: the next time I go "to Italy," I won't fail to look for what you say about it; unfortunately, there are no autogrill where I am.)
Voto:
Come on, that way you lose the realism of the film. If I take a Lindt excellence, put you in a dark room like space and leave you kilometers away behind a spaceship glass... I bet you can’t see the cubes, right? Come on, let’s give it a try, give me your number, meanwhile I’ll get a dark room like space with spaceship furniture.
Voto:
The togo is round, that one wasn't round. But, in fact, the ritter sport is square, and that one was rectangular. Ah, there it is, it was a lindt exellance 99% cocoa: rectangular, thin in thickness, and completely black. Yes, there it was.
Voto:
<< The review isn't about him, but I'll share what I think of the album. >> This album is Anderson & Dregen set to music. Show-offs in search of girls, beer, and party. << I didn't write anger, but angry referring to the work. >> Angry, not even. No, no, no.
Voto:
All this stuff? It seemed to me like the story of an acid-tripping astronaut chasing a giant Ritter Sport. Then he grows old and dies. Oh, and his computer breaks down in the middle of the movie.
Voto:
"I normally oppose labeling music," but I am highly in favor. I actually like it. So I don't absolve. If they don't like labeling, then they shouldn't have put genres. Instead, they put the worst genre on the planet. It's like saying, "I don't like insulting at all, asshole!" Same mechanism.
Voto:
No, it’s not a matter of “think what you like.” Nikke Anderson is NOT a punker. Tell me what’s punk about him. << Punk in terms of the violent orientation given to music >> is a nonsensical phrase; if the orientation is “violent,” then it’s not punk but metal (and this isn’t even metal, nor that violent, actually). << referring largely to Hard Rock >> In “good measure”? This is pure Hard Rock, without any measures, good or bad; it’s a shameless 70s Hard Rock revival, in every way: attitude, style, techniques, sound, lyrical themes, clothing, live shows, videos... everything. << harsh and angry >> You have a very faint and sugary definition of Anger. Anderson is a flamboyant show-off, far from “anger.” He’s a guy looking for girls and beer, not for fights. Go back to the dictionary, Anger; you’ll find it after Rhubarb. Without thinking it as you like, this is too simple. Think it as you must.
Voto:
Ah, by the way, I obviously haven't read the review. I read the title, say "hooray!", then I read the genre: punk rock. And that's it, only punk rock. One star and five for the album, right away. They're just automatics.
Voto:
<<I’m punk when it comes to the violent orientation given to music, >> you’re the only human being on earth who, when you say "violent music," responds: punk!. Not that punk is hazelnut cream spread, but there are 8 million musical styles that are much more violent. Try listening to what the leader of the Cotteri was doing before he became master inferno-cottero: violent stuff, really violent. Punk has other peculiarities, and here there isn’t a goddamn thing of punk at all. There’s no punk attitude, no punk simplicity, no sparse punk sound, no chains and idiot hair, but rather flared pants and smooth hair in the wind. It’s not punk, no, not at all, not even close. This takes from the same stuff that punkers took from, only the punkers ruined that stuff and threw it in the shit, while Anderson did a revival. Here there’s no attempt at revolution, here there’s no anger, there’s just a desire to make a mess playing great '70s revival. No, not punk, no, not at all, not even close, no. I take this as an offense, since I have the original. I don’t buy punk records. No, not at all, it’s never happened and it never will.
Voto:
The scene with the pimp is absolutely delightful. But, above all, the protagonist dies: a masterpiece regardless. Long live dead protagonists, especially if they meet a gruesome end.