puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7876 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Oh, but she is Mango's daughter!

Damn, it seemed strange to me, someone who hasn't left YouTube since 2020 is impossible (unless they are a child of art), even 13 Pietro, despite having Morandi as a surname, managed to become a YouTuber.

Anyway, she's good, Mahmood is good but too Franco-Magrebino (in terms of sound, mood, style, etc.), this one is definitely Italian and now that I understand that Mango is "the surname," it was obvious she would be.
Voto:
I had no idea about his political commitment to the Communist Imperial Dictatorship of the '70s, absolutely none. I was firmly convinced that every one of his albums had at least one mega-hit that I knew, but this one? I don't recognize a single track (though I did remember the title and cover), and surely not the earlier ones either, since I thought Rimmel was the first.

Staying away from the Radio since youth works. It works really well.
Voto:
It's beautiful, a bit fanciful and exaggerated but without crossing into the ridiculous, a Poor Guy Ritchie Romanized in the plot, but bad à la Sidney Lumet where everyone pays the price.

Surely the best from Sollima, if he wrote it himself. But come on, The Most Beautiful of Sollima in General, Gomorra is a little piece of crap, Romanzo Criminale is very nice but considering that the true story was MUCH more interesting and it has been all sanitized instead of exaggerated, it loses a lot of points.
Voto:
But can you tell us about the film? What is the meaning?
Voto:
The Official Livery of the new Daytona (a truly crappy car for the quality/price ratio) is practically identical to the outfit of the girl on the cover.

After the 80s overdose of recent years, now we should be entering the "Revival of the futuristic 70s," which is sort of like a "Hypothetical Future Perfect Past."

I usually get it right—there’s always my review where I predict the pope’s death—so the odds are 2 to 1, the house starts with 275 euros, minimum bet 50.
Voto:
@[sfascia carrozze] waiting in Goloritzè for the DeMeeting of May 2014. (the 10th Year Remaster)

Ingrandisci questa immagine
Voto:
Bro, where did you find that cover, in the damp? Damn, it must have 4 pixels in total 😂👌
Voto:
Googla: *Japan WWII Geneva Convention*.
Or "Japan War Crimes"

To find such crap, you have to go back to Genghis Khan or empires from millennia ago.

They had some strange ideas; maybe 2 were too many, but they chose it themselves anyway.

I don’t know exactly why, but the average Westerner thinks there was only Pearl Harbor, forgetting about the tortures in Korea and throughout their Empire.

Not by chance, in fact, none of them ever says anything about the bombs, only ignorant Westerners like the Faggio di Foppapedretti.
Voto:
In Italy, we have people who evaluate the value of actors... But then in 90% of cases, it’s always Giuppy Izzo or La Giannini that they listen to. And you hear them arguing, "she's better than her"... It’s always Izzo or Giannini.

You hear people saying that De Niro is shit now. I mean, can you believe it? De Niro, somehow, can no longer act. Must be that Amendola is dead? Huh.

It’s an audience that never emerged; it’s obvious that nobody cares about serious films.
Voto:
The problem with De Lillo read after '95 is that EVERYONE copied him. But, EVERYONE.

He was the first to talk about Modern Alienation, Home Work Home, Competition, etc., etc... Things that, starting from the comedians onward, EVERYONE has copied.

To name one among 8000, not American, Beppe Grillo in the '90s practically quoted De Lillo. Then Palahniuk, Bret Easton Ellis, but also that guy from Infinite Jest (he wasn’t exactly copied, absolutely not, but the themes are the same).

And what’s the problem? The problem is that those who were inspired by him made a hell of a lot more money and sales, so De Lillo seems "already seen and heard," but in reality, he was almost the first.

So, rating for De Lillo: SEVEN THOUSAND out of Ten.

Would I recommend a De Lillo book? Only to someone who wants to read a Proto... Meaning practically no one.