puntiniCAZpuntini

<< "Mohammed Ali (also known as Cassius Clay)" is not entirely wrong >> Cassius is what his father named him. Clay was his father's surname. It's not at all certain that it was the owner of some distant ancestor who gave him the surname "Clay" (to a DISTANT ANCESTOR). Maybe Clay was decided by the free son of the always-distant ancestor of the distant slave ancestor. Anyway, the name is Cassius Clay, also known as Mohammed Ali, boxing legend retired due to a "legal misunderstanding," because politics has nothing to do with boxing, so all retirements that aren't for sports reasons or injuries are legal misunderstandings. << Ali, kill him (not Ali, win for us, go Ali, you're the best, you're a legend), doesn’t that seem like enough hate? >> Who cares if the public hated him; the public has nothing to do with boxing, no connection whatsoever. If we can talk about "hate," always in quotation marks since it’s boxing and not Mortal Kombat, then we talk about Clay-Frazier, definitely not Clay-Foreman. There were people in France-Italy who wanted Zidane dead, but that doesn’t mean Del Piero isn’t his friend. << Ali represented the African nation and Foreman the United States. >> A couple of bullshits. Clay was born in KENTUCKY, and if he hadn't been born in KENTUCKY, he would have been just any African. He wouldn't have had gyms to train in, he wouldn't have had coaches, he wouldn't have had anything, he wouldn't have been a boxer. Clay is an AMERICAN BOXER. Then, whether he is African inside, it has nothing to do with boxing. He could have changed houses, names, and sexual preferences, but as a boxer, he remained of American school. Just as Zidane is Algerian by birth but is of French football schooling. << the cases of films that recount the deeds of someone without falling into hagiography can be counted on the fingers of one hand. >> So what? Just because this one is less worse than others, doesn’t mean it isn’t crap. There are certainly some that are worse, but the fact remains that this one is medium crap, or plain-crap-without-more.

What was the name of "that bald guy"? And Bronson, why hasn't he made "the vigilante of home serene" yet? It's been a while since I've seen a Bronson film, but is he still alive?

I like Peckinpah SO MUCH... that I've avoided watching his Western films. As if I were afraid of breaking something. The Western is also my father's favorite genre (he has my full support, your recently stated physical law), preferential peaks that rise exponentially with the presence of "that bald guy" or Charles Bronson.

For example, yesterday I saw 300 (pirated). Hypergay that too.

Of course, it would be fantastic to see John Wayne at 90 and John Ford screwing him while waving a lasso and shouting "ihhh--hààà!". What a shame, pearls of cinema lost in the sea of "if it had been made, you know how great it would have been..."

It's not an offense "gay genre," it's just what it seems to me. Tough men, brave, valiant, dirty, sweaty, and all of a piece. All that's missing is for them to slap each other on the ass, to be perfect plots for gay porn movies. Don't you think?

Ah, even Wild Paths sucks for me.

If I connect to a website, it's already preset that "I have time to waste." But beyond that, reading a headline, remembering that it made you feel like shit, clicking on it, putting a one and writing "it sucks," doesn't take up your entire afternoon. It's only fair that the average is calculated with the votes of different types of people; otherwise, it's not an "average."

Well, as far as I can remember, I have always been a convinced Japanese. Half an episode of Sam, the Boy from the West, is worth the entire American filmography.

Ah, and above all, I can't stand John Wayne.