puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7899 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
<<< I am kind to those who deserve it; I don't give pearls to pigs. >>> Look, look at how you contradict yourself! First, you said, "I see that with you common sense and good manners have little effect," which implies that you tried to be polite. Yet you didn’t; as you then confirm. You can’t maintain a logical thread for more than three words; you need to put in more effort, damn it, you need to put in more effort. I'm trying to help you, but in a desperate case like yours, the "patient" must put in some soul. << I DON'T BELIEVE at all that you have read this book. >> Well, believe what you want. After all, the opinion of a mentally impaired person isn’t that important. More effort, more effort.
Voto:
"I see that common sense and good manners have little effect on you." Because, have you ever been kind? Try reading this discussion again. You have never been kind, neither here nor elsewhere. Not that I care, but it's just to point out yet another of your meaningless statements, thrown out randomly and without any real basis. You dream up things. It’s proven. "The fact that you REALLY READ this book lowers your credibility by 70%." Who knows what intrinsic meaning this statement hides... I can only imagine something Oscar-worthy...
Voto:
<< Come on, everyone has seen that photo (now you've just changed it!). >> I've never changed a photo in my life: you, your brain is mush. Trust me, the photo has been the same for the past three years. << instead of "staying on point" and talking ABOUT the movie. >>> I'm not here to talk about movies. I don't care about them, and I've already written that above... you always need me to repeat things at least twice. But I’m being nice, I feel sorry for you, so I'm trying to help. For example, let's take these last meaningless sentences. << GIVING 1 STAR without even justifying it >> No, no. I justified it, you need to read carefully, say it out loud, and you might see that after ten times one thing at a time you can absorb it. I wrote that it ruined a great book. I really like the book, not the movie, so: one. <<< Critical ability = 0.01%, capacity for unfounded chaos = 90% >>> Come on, come on... you can't even count. 0.01%, added to the remaining 90%, makes 90.01%. And where did you leave the other 9.9%? Buy yourself an abacus, try it at home, and when you get there... come back to the board. Come on, come on.
Voto:
Wow, you really are a desperate case. But I trust in that little bit of neurons that, somewhere remote, perhaps still function. So: I'll explain it to you again. No, there is no hypothetical condition. There is no "if," there is no oversight. I am not Vic Sorriso, without ifs. And you, it’s not that you have oversights, but rather you lack the bare minimum of analytical sense to make conjectures about "who is who." You can't do it, it’s too much for you. You just dream things up. For example, where does this toothpick... come from? I've never had a toothpick in my mouth in my life; I hold the toothpick between my fingers after eating, I use it, then I throw it away. I've never kept it in my mouth, let alone in a photo. Realize this: your brain is not functioning well. Accept it. Come on.
Voto:
I (like anyone else) go where I want without needing you to invite me, I don't whine, I don't want appointments with you, no. And it’s not "an excuse" that you got me involved here, no. It’s a fact: you got me involved here. Yes. And you insist on this bullshit of Vic Sorriso/Zigghio. There’s no "if you’re not," no, there’s no "I must have messed up," no, there’s no hypothetical time, no. There’s only "I am not," followed by "you’re spouting idiotic nonsense." And the blah blah blah blah that you sprinkle throughout, from the little boy to the appointments to the spoiled one, are just a way to dodge a single issue: you always spout nonsense because your brain simply can’t reason anything of better quality. It’s a fact that proves itself every single time. Mine isn’t "breaking your balls," but testing facts. Without blah blah blah blah blah...
Voto:
<< Music is a matter of subjective judgment. >> But, in fact, I specifically wrote << It could also be a fantastic sax solo, but for it to be the best of all is a giant load of crap. Also because "the best" doesn't exist. >> So it seems we agree, right? If you can't read, it's not my fault. <<< many people who think Chopin is musical Art and King Crimson is a silly band? >>> It's quite normal for a classical fanatic not to appreciate the attempt to incorporate it - very diluted - into rock. Maybe they see it as an attempt to belittle it (classical music). If you can't make that simple connection and believe it's all "de gustibus," well, that's not my fault. Try with a Fiesta, and you'll be back on track.
Voto:
<< As soon as you’re cornered, >> Cornered? Since you dream of me at night, you see me where I am not, imagining my comments that I never wrote... am I the one being cornered? Do you realize you write nonsensical things? (Hence, the definition of a Mentally Challenged Person) << you start to "call people mentally challenged or idiots," closing the discussions there. >> No, I haven’t closed anything. I asked you a question, calling you mentally challenged because you were responding to me when I hadn’t written anything to you, nor had I passed by here; you didn’t reply, and I repeated it, calling you mentally challenged because questions need to be asked twice for you to understand them. The second time you answered with an idiotic conjecture, and I explained to you why that conjecture was idiotic, and from the fact that you make idiotic conjectures, I drew once again that you are mentally challenged. I haven’t closed a discussion at all. In fact, I'm still here.
Voto:
<< BUT WHO THE FUCK DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?!? >> You. That's who, YOU. You called me here, responding to a comment of mine that was never written. You, trying to pin mr.mille fake on me because you feel lonely thinking you have a dozen and talk to yourself with various nicknames. That's who, you. I'm not just randomly insulting you; I first prove that you're stupid and that you ask questions that backfire on you, and after proving it, I repeat, again and again: you are mentally challenged. You, always you.
Voto:
<<< you think a FAKE is just for "telling someone to fuck off" >>> Well, you're just an idiot then. You're not talking "randomly," but you're talking about two well-defined characters, who have written enough stuff here to, let's say, "know each other." It's not that you've assigned me "any random fake," but rather "THE FAKE" par excellence. The one who has so many nicknames that he even surpasses you. He has at least 20 (fakes) and tells someone to fuck off every two seconds. So it's not that "a fake is only for that," but rather Vic Sorriso, does only that. And besides, it seems he talks about cinema. Something that I neither do nor will I ever do. Your ability to assess is zero; you're stupid, and I prove it to you every damn time. Or not? You change the subject, talk about this and that, and I instead, show you that you're mentally impaired. Every - Damn - Time.
Voto:
<<< Rumors tell me that PUNTINICAZZ = VIC SORRISO. >>> But what rumors, these are just bullshit born from your inferior mind. I don’t need a fake; I candidly tell to fuck off anyone I think deserves it with this nickname. You are truly inferior if you can’t make this simple connection.