puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank ™: 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7889 days

Love
  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Estelle Shine
Estelle Shine
26 dec 08
Voto:
"I'll give you proof with another stamp." Again? Do the math, you fool; the data is CALCULATED, NOT PRINTED. 192kbps means 192 kilobytes per second. You calculate how many seconds are in an hour, multiply that by 192, and you get the kilobytes needed for an hour of sound at 192 kbps. Divide the Kb into MB, and you might just get the number I'm talking about. I'm not talking about albums, I'm not talking about music, I'm not talking about Black Metal. I'm talking about the bullshit you say: mathematically verifiable. The only reason why you can't make an exact estimate is that there are files with VBR bitrate; otherwise, it would be very easy: you just had to group the audio files by bitrate. Keep chatting, and you'll see that your brain will kick in sooner or later.
Estelle Shine
Estelle Shine
26 dec 08
Voto:
Calculate that these folders start from 80, some are larger and some smaller, but always in double digits, and they include all possible genres. >>> Blah blah blah. Words. Give me the count of the years of music you have, we’ve already done it for you. We’ve shown you that what you say is IMPOSSIBLE, and therefore you're just spouting nonsense. Then you can show me the folders, I don’t care, because I already know it’s impossible for what you say to be true, numbers in hand. No more foolish chatter. You’re just a pathetic person convinced you're talking to metal kids, but you’ve got the wrong site. I see you've already changed the subject, talking about folders instead of terabytes, since at least you've realized you have no idea of the immense amount of data you claimed to possess. Let me refresh the concept: I’m not talking about music, but mathematically verifiable nonsense: hours and bytes, not years of publication. You, cannot possibly have listened to 3.2 years of uninterrupted music properly. Neither you nor Scaruffi.
Estelle Shine
Estelle Shine
26 dec 08
Voto:
I was talking about sharing, not downloading. In my opinion, you don't even have an idea of the data you’re giving away; it's clear you don't quite grasp what terabytes, gigabytes, and megabytes are. Maybe if you see a RAM stick, you’d mistake it for a wing from your little brother’s Mazinga.
Estelle Shine
Estelle Shine
26 dec 08
Voto:
<< Normal discs at 192 or 256 are around 80, 90, 100 >> NO. Do the math with a calculator, it's not like that at all. <<< it will only be a thousand full non-original albums, having 2 TB of music DOES NOT mean having 2 TB of just albums. >>> I have a thousand properly ripped albums, my original discs, and they took me less than 200 gigabytes, and if you do the math, you'll see it's true. So, stop talking nonsense. You’re throwing out nonsense, we did the math for you. It's MATHEMATICS, NOT TALK. YOU'RE TALKING NONSENSE.
Estelle Shine
Estelle Shine
26 dec 08
Voto:
I'm at my parents' house and I really have nothing to do, you know how Christmas is...
Estelle Shine
Estelle Shine
26 dec 08
Voto:
Ah, another small note. Neither the mule, nor soulseek, nor any p2p program would support a sharing of two terabytes. At the first person who tries to see your files, the program would freeze. Now tell me you download from a NASA PC, with ten terabytes of RAM. That's all that's missing to complete the line of bullshit under the tree, you idiot.
Estelle Shine
Estelle Shine
26 dec 08
Voto:
4000 discs? I can maybe believe it, but too bad that two terabytes equal 2 million megabytes, and if a disc is 70 megabytes, the calculation barely adds up to TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DISCS. So, since you yourself say <<< even 4000 CDs (above that figure it’s a bit hard to believe) >>>, and adding the TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND pirate discs you have to the THREE THOUSAND (and some) originals, that makes EIGHTY-EIGHT THOUSAND DISCS. The only kid here is you, if you really believe that thirty-year-olds would let themselves be taken for fools in this way by a poor idiot like you. Eighty-eight thousand for one hour of content means eighty-eight thousand hours, which equals 3.2 years of non-stop music; this means it would take you at least 32 years minimum to listen to all that stuff just once, listening to music every day for two and a half hours a day. So let’s say a normal person (about 7 hours a week) would take FIFTY YEARS. Always, FOR ONE SINGLE LISTEN EACH. Math is not an opinion, and you are truly a massive idiot. Buy fewer CDs and more calculators, and tell your nephew this nonsense.
Estelle Shine
Estelle Shine
25 dec 08
Voto:
It doesn't seem nerdy at all to point out when someone is talking nonsense. In every topic, even the most useless, it's always a good practice to let someone know (if they do it) that they're talking nonsense. Because it's a duty. More than anything, it seems to me that the current population of the site is too soft-hearted, allowing any idiot to write freely. I always belong to just one party (in here), whose motto is: bullshit goes on your blog. Someone who reviews this one, which is just the usual megaclone and, on top of that, is ugly (the other millions of megaclones at least look good) and comes to tell me "ne sò troppo perchècciò due tera!", it's a case of harassment, one of those to pursue until they leave. We are facing a serious case of a human being, and my instincts never fail; they have never failed. This is an idiot through and through, guaranteed for life.
Estelle Shine
Estelle Shine
25 dec 08
Voto:
2 Terabytes of music files, it's practically almost impossible to have. The only possible scenario is that you're ripping CDs in .wav format, getting 800 megabytes per album instead of the usual 60-80 (depending on the bitrate). I could believe it, maybe, if you told me there are about two thousand videos in the mix, otherwise it's nonsense. Grab a calculator and figure out how many hours of uninterrupted music you have, with two terabytes at 224kbps (taken as an average among the many files found at 192 and the few at 320). You can't have had the time to listen to all that stuff in the few years since music downloading became a thing. But do you know how much a terabyte is? Go tell it on www.scuolamaterna.it that you have two terabytes of mp3s, maybe they'll believe you. I have 600 gigabytes, haven't downloaded anything in six months, and I'll still have at least 200 gigabytes (minimum) left to listen to (decently, not just hitting play while making polenta with the birds). You didn't have the actual time to listen to two terabytes, unless you've had fiber optic since '92 and have been retired since '85. You're spouting some pretty good nonsense, well done.
Mos Def Mathematics
Mos Def Mathematics
25 dec 08
Voto:
I had already done it years ago, it can't be me. Unless they deliberately used something I had already done, just to make it seem like it couldn't be me. Or maybe not.
Similar users
egr

DeRank™: 0,05

dark_kingdom

DeRank™: 0,00

Den Vlaams

DeRank™: -3,12

EarlGrey

DeAge 7277

gianmarco86

DeRank™: 0,00

ZiOn

DeRank™: 25,46

Badi

DeAge 7041

M@ynardJamesKeen@n

DeRank™: 0,00

I_lOVE_mUSIc 

DeRank™: 0,06

Hal

DeRank™: 9,08

Groups
zzo_guardi Grunged Cartuns Comindeb SantoNatal ScieMenZiaTi Raggruppatore W_I_NEGRI Cactus DeSarder RadioDelirio Electroma Fante Championship Tutausend Supercazzolaro
Rewards
october 2003
october 2004
february 2005
week 42 - 2003
week 44 - 2003
week 2 - 2004
week 13 - 2004
week 28 - 2004
week 40 - 2004
week 6 - 2005
week 10 - 2005
week 11 - 2005
week 13 - 2005
week 29 - 2005
week 15 - 2006
week 42 - 2007
Gran Visir -la recensione