puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7950 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Well, if we want to be precise <<< zappa was never played on any radio >>> Bullshit. Zappa was definitely played on the radio, and he always received great acclaim in all the magazines around the world, and when he died, it was reported by every news program in Italy, let alone worldwide. <<< he never had any problem living off his music, >>> Bullshit. He interrupted countless tours because he was losing money. Okay, opinions are fine, but when it comes to factual accuracy, in my view, you've written nonsense, or inaccuracies, or just plain bullshit.
Voto:
<<< thinking that the radios influence the record market in any way >>> No. you didn't understand the point. I didn't write that, and I don't think it. Reread it, you'll be luckier.
Voto:
I wish that people who can make music could live off of it, so they can make more records for me to listen to, and 100 bands don’t break up every month because one member has to get a job. That’s the reason. But as we’ve known for years, you are limited and you couldn’t get there on your own.
Voto:
Imagine how wonderful it would be, millions of people in the square burning Scialpi t-shirts... hordes of kids drowning the usual jerk who offers you "the nice t-shirt" with his acoustic guitar on the beach... just thinking about it makes me feel better.
Voto:
Cpt, your argument makes sense, but it applies to you, as you already have a refined taste from the fact that you know how to seek out records. Let's try a thought experiment: someone who doesn't buy records, lacks refined taste, and always hangs out on Radio Deejay and similar crap. By eliminating the possibility of crap, after a few years of stagnation, there would be a turnaround. For example: at the beginning of the 1900s, cocaine was legally used, and it was nice to offer it to guests, like coffee. Freud recommended it to many of his patients. Then they made it illegal, and after a few years of chaos, now it's seen by most as the devil. If you made crap music illegal, I believe the same would happen. Let's arrest Cremonini, crucify the Pooh, I don't know, let's cut the hair of the Tokio Hotel guy. If nothing happens after that, well, at least we tried. And at least there’s one less awful hairstyle in the world.
Voto:
Yeeeh, now you're doing the cleaning... but no one believes it...
Voto:
<< Don't generalize >> I'm not generalizing. As far as I've understood in the two or three days I've been around, we're discussing art here. Art has nothing to do with utility. Therefore, no one denies the usefulness of the intercom, which saves you from climbing the stairs, but if I had to read a review of my new Bticino with video, I would include one. Beyond this, the main reason I wrote here was the self-review. Since I'm not in the head of the reviewer, I can't know if they admitted to being the author out of honesty or out of pride. Obviously, I think poorly of it, and I assess it as pride. So there!
Voto:
Come on, one doesn't need to write "for me" 189 times in every comment. It's obvious that, since we're talking about things where personal taste reigns supreme, the "for me" is implied by default. Sure, if they turned off all the radios, I'd be happier because people would be forced to look for records themselves, and they would definitely find better things than what’s playing around. Maybe you walk into a bar at Termini Station and find yourself in the middle of "The Best Band You Never Heard In Your Life," or even Suomi Finland Perkele. There would be more personality in public places, and not just that damn Linus or Albertino. For me, you know, for me.
Voto:
<<< Sorry, but when you want to highlight a sentence or a passage, what do you do? rewind it? >>> The scratch!
Voto:
<<< I find audiobooks extremely useful >>> a can opener is useful too. Let's review them! << Caz, Caz... it makes sense for you, but only for you, right! >> For me, only what makes sense to me has the right to exist. Since it's a personal opinion, I am my own law. I'm not saying you’re all idiots, I'm just saying I would feel like an idiot. But since when do we debate a personal opinion here? <<< free hands easily lead to distraction. >>> That has a pretty good double meaning.