puntiniCAZpuntini

Yes, yes, yes... keep believing it. At least you. Convince yourself. Come on.

But my stereo is probably twenty years old. And you know it. Always playing the fool, huh... you deny it, backtrack, twist the words, but deep down you know you have problems, you just don’t want to admit it. I’m just enough of an asshole to point it out every time. The first step to solving a problem is admitting that you have one. I had lost the urge to point out how messed up you are, but then when I read your comment on Trell’s page, well, you made me sick to my stomach again. Get yourself together, do this favor for humanity. After all, you’re even unemployed now (and how did I find out? Heh heh heh...) so you’ve got plenty of time to spend in rehab.

It shouldn't matter to anyone. You know well that I'm right, even if you deny it. And I know that it gnaws at you. The others have nothing to do with it, they don't care, nor should they care. But you know I'm right, and it eats at you. Quite a bit.

But when will you stop spouting nonsense? <<< Obviously, you didn't listen to it "objectively" >>> Just stop, seriously. What does "listening objectively" even mean? <<< Miles' trumpet is nothing... it sounds poor... it lacks ideas...>>> Too bad that in this album, his goal wasn't the trumpet, but the Groove. His trumpet was just a backdrop. <<< while the other fool raps stuff that sounds old today. >>> Besides the fact that you didn't even notice that there are half a dozen rappers here, not just one; you can't say "this rap sounds old." Rap simply doesn't sound. And now, last but not least... here it is, the nonsense of the year: <<< Look, I prefer any album by Eminem >>> But when will you stop? You are the biggest idiot who has ever written in here, the king of human cases, and you still write. Reread the series of crap you've written in this discussion: how can you write <<< consider this album a benchmark for the hip-hop scene, trip-hop, down tempo, and all the cloned derivatives that followed >>> and at the same time say that this album isn't worth a damn? You need to make peace with your brain, with all your three hundred writings under four different usernames and thoughts, with all the nonsense you say, then twist, then take back, and above all, then deny. You make me feel so sorry for you that you even disgust me; you can pretend nothing is happening and continue to interact with those who have been reading these pages for less than two years, but trust me, they have read your nonsense from the beginning. They know full well that you have serious mental issues, in addition to an awful musical taste, and a face that could only belong to an immense fool. And you know very well that I know your face, it's just that you threatened the webmasters with lawsuits to prevent me from publishing it. You are a pathetic loser, now more than ever, and I will never tire of telling you that you are and will always remain a poor, slow-witted loser.

Do you know this: <ae911truth.info>? It says interesting (and quite detailed) things about "LIES and ERRORS" from ae911truth.org. >>> As I mentioned before, the more you """"""investigate"""" (a thousand quotes, because investigating on the internet is half a joke) the more confused you get. That website is nice too.

The P2 was certainly something else, good old Gelli really was quite a character... but the Bush family isn't to be underestimated either. Start with Samuel Prescott, George Junior's great-grandfather, moving on to Prescott (grandfather) and George Senior. You'll find arms industries from World War I, banks accused of handling Nazi money in the aftermath of World War II, and, above all, "guilty" of having financed the Nazi party before the war. The skulls & bones pattern always repeats itself for all these young lads, the Rockefeller family and consequently the Federal Reserve are always close friends, you'll find censorship from senators who claimed that something didn't add up... they haven't stopped for a moment, starting with the great-grandfather. Not to mention that now there isn't a single Bush who doesn't hold a prominent decision-making position. I had read terrible things, I delved into it, and those terrible things multiplied and branched out everywhere. And I’m talking about news I read from official sources and completely normal serious newspaper websites (The Times to name one), not blogs that I could also create to write that, in reality, the towers were brought down by Moana, who isn’t dead but has become a bearded terrorist.

I don't absolutely believe in the 19 bad Arabs, nor do I completely believe in Zeitgeist, or this, or Moore. The more you read, the more you watch, the more you inform yourself, the more confused you get. Then you start to think: "Isn't it possible that this one says so because it benefits them?" And it goes on with the ramblings. The architects who say "it's normal for the collapse after the impact" could have been paid, or those who say "a collapse was impossible" might have a vested interest in an American political crisis. I am indeed more inclined towards the conspiracy, but not to the incredible extent described here. It could very well be, trying to reason it out without facts that fully confirm it, that the attackers really wanted to take everything down, the CIA found out, and instead of stopping them, they lent a hand with a few little bombs here and there. NB: I wrote "it could very well be that," I am not at the CIA and I cannot know. Also because there is the flight instructor who says "that Arab couldn't pilot," and then there is another who says "he's not a flight instructor." More than anything, I don't understand one thing: many of my peers know a lot about the towers, and many barely know what "Piazza Fontana" means, and if you say "strategy of tension," they think you are talking about an electrical panel. Not that knowing a lot "about the towers" is useless, but let’s say it would be very useful to know things about our own house.

"They have 'numbers' that are not significant." Precisely, the 'argument by absurdity' had the ultimate goal: let’s raise their numbers and lower the others. But without skyrocketing into millions. I don't believe that a musician, no matter how talented, deserves to live in mansions worth billions and own 200 classic cars (Mason). Too few people circulate within his sphere to make me think it is right and just. It doesn’t bother me at all that Mr. Volkswagen-Audi-Porsche-Lamborghini -Skoda (to give a quick example) has billions; in fact, I respect him greatly, and he is someone who drives the world economy. Jimmy Page, no. When I say "living off music," I mean something average, not lavish things that even annoy me. I could only resist Black Sabbath and Floyd (first 4 Sabbath, Floyd up to but not including DSOTM); for the rest, I never spent on those who already had billions. I have two original Zep records, but they were gifts. Zero Deep Purple, no talk of Beatles, and so on. Obviously, I have my 'youth mistakes' like KoRn or Wu-Tang (mistakes based on the principle stated before, not on the albums, which are still valuable). I only gave in to DVDs, but they are few. I prefer to download Tool (or rather, have them dubbed) and buy Farflung, even if the Tool album is a thousand times better (just as an example, since they are two incomparable bands). And this also serves a different purpose from the principle, namely: many when they have too much money, become soft. And since 80% of my listening is hard music, money can ruin the music. The examples are numerous, as are the exceptions, obviously. << Not the various more or less underground bands that now (since it has become a necessity because musicians live off concerts at this point) allow themselves a wider live audience. >> Yes, that’s true. Jus Oborn, Mr. Electric Wizard, deeply hates going on tour. Deeply. Well, now he even goes. Still very, very little, but he goes. << When talking about artists who don’t go on the radio, obviously in some names this is done as a rhetorical figure. >> Well, not really. I don’t know you, I don’t know what you might mean, and you don’t know what I might mean. Since this is only written communication, which, in addition to the low mutual knowledge, has the added absence of expressions (which help; if I had you in front of me, I would understand your discourse better just from your tone of voice), I take the words exactly as they are written, with no implied meanings. Maybe I'm wrong; I just wanted to inform you that I read "he doesn’t go on the radio" and understood "he doesn’t go on the radio." I default to "for me," and also the fact that since our discussions don’t determine the fate of humanity, one can exaggerate greatly in judgments ("beautiful" becomes "wonderful," and "very good" becomes "genius"). P.S. WHAT A LONG RANT! It’s been years since I wrote such long posts.

I understand well the differences you're talking about. << Azz, here you can never argue (smiley face). >>

A shout-out to everyone else I haven't "seen" in a while. And to Hardrock: no, I stopped studying in my first year of high school. And then, the lawyer... brrr... it's a profession I couldn't do since I always like to say what I think, even when no one gives a damn about what I think.