puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8160 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
"But built in a lab by whom?" By him. I repeat: to shamelessly imitate Frankie Hi Nrg in themes and Eminem in voice and moves. It's a Product, shamelessly a product crafted so blatantly it’s disgusting. "I can't understand what’s 'constructed' about Caparezza." I re-repeat: to shamelessly imitate Frankie Hi Nrg in themes and Eminem in voice and moves. It's a Product, shamelessly a product crafted so blatantly it’s disgusting. You may not agree, but don't say I didn't explain myself.
Voto:
<< The mediocre can be recognized by those who think at least a little in the musical field, precisely by the rating they give to Caparezza. >> So now Miky Mix is the benchmark for determining who thinks or not in music. Wow. He's just a poor guy who realized a bit too late that instead of making pop music, it was more convenient to shamelessly imitate Frankie Hi Nrg in themes and Eminem in voice and moves. He’s a Product, shamelessly a product crafted so obviously that it's disgusting. He might have built himself up, but there’s nothing in him, not even a crumb of something that I haven't already seen or heard extensively. He is nothing. Let alone a comparison point.
Voto:
For me, he’s a poor thing. In every way: as a man, musician, rapper, technique, taste, rhythm, groove, and sound. His best work is definitely in the first album
Voto:
Perhaps it's not clear to you: I was saying that rather than listening to the opinion of some random X, shaped through exchanges of opinions with other Xs, it would be so much nicer/cooler/winner/acceptable/inte resting/pleasurable/vibrant to hear the opinion of an Italian conservative (!) professor at Columbia—Obama's Columbia, mind you—who is renowned worldwide as the greatest living political scientist, who views the Italian political regime more or less as a media circus/authoritarian... what do you think? Sometimes someone forgets they're on a site for the exchange of spontaneous and, frankly, ridiculous personal opinions, perhaps thinking that a comment could determine the fate of humanity. Thank goodness it's better to hear the viewpoint of someone who doesn't think about anything else from morning till night. But their vote is worth as much as that of an eighteen-year-old who only thinks about matching their shoes with their hoodie. Damn universal suffrage, on this we are (I repeat) on the same wavelength.
Voto:
Political science is reduced like this because politics has become (for us, it has been since the dawn of time) a realm of the powerful, the well-connected, various cliques, lobbies, and today, of "veline." Indeed. You act accordingly.
Voto:
“Damn universal suffrage.” There you go, you’ve got it. A civil engineer can build houses, I can’t. A doctor can perform surgeries, I can’t. But a Political Scientist (or whatever you call yourselves) really isn’t anyone, and after years of study, they come out at the same level they entered. My vote is worth as much as yours, and I don’t know who Sartori is, nor do I care to know, and the Prime Minister is someone who maybe, exaggerating, has a diploma. But you can always think that “90% of right-wing people don’t pay attention to theories because they’re as smart as a goat,” and enjoy the idea that only you are intelligent. When you get tired of seeing your curriculum that nobody cares about, maybe you’ll start to think that perhaps you’re not so sharp after all.
Voto:
<< Little political scientists are growing up. >> You are the one who wants to draw a fixed rule or a mental rant from this; I just wrote what I think and what everyone I know who votes right thinks. And there are many, many, many of us. And we all think the same thing, the thing I wrote. Then you can draw whatever conclusions you want, but know that people who vote right usually do so because they are pragmatic, so they couldn't care less about all the theories. And certainly, they don't waste time in hilarious universities like political science, a worthy anteroom of failure, precariousness, and unemployment. But with so many nice theories.
Voto:
Well, I randomly said 5%, but of all the people I know who vote PDL, a net 0% votes for Silvio because they like Silvio. There are surely many, but I don't know even one.
Voto:
It's quite comical how in Italy, those who vote on the left can say "I don't vote left, but I vote anti-right," while for them, those who vote on the right must vote for Berlusconi. Not just any party, not even "on the right," but they vote specifically for Berlusconi, him and only him. It's rare to find someone who understands that among those millions of votes, there are still people voting right because they are right-leaning—without being in love with Silvio—and there are also people voting anti-left because they expect something more than just an anti-Silvio program. When the left understands this, and especially that many people couldn't care less about Silvio whether he's in charge or arrested, they could manage to take away at least 15-20% net from the PDL, if not more. But it seems they will never understand that only about 5% really votes for Silvio, him and only him.
Voto:
No, you’re not there yet; in fact, you’re drifting off into the philosophical. There’s nothing to explain and no one who needs to understand anything. I’ll repeat it: if you don’t read the review of the broken bottles and the hair without a crest in its natural color, you’ll always be off track.