puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8017 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
I believe that witnessing a painting being created is comparable to listening to a record starting from when the Maple trees are planted to make the instruments.
Voto:
"To admire Leonardo or Picasso, you have to enter a museum somewhere, but you can appreciate a good record quietly at home." But to truly appreciate the music of that record, you have to go hear it live, so it’s the same. In fact, any day you’re in Paris, the Mona Lisa is right there. Picasso will be wherever he is. Toni Iommi is who knows where the hell he is; either you go that day at that hour or forget it. If you want to hear a substitute, then just download the 3000 x 6000 jpeg of the Mona Lisa, and it’s like having "a record." Just for reasoning, I repeat that I really couldn't care less about any drawing on planet Earth.
Voto:
<< Of the artworks reviewed here, I haven't seen most of them. >> Neither have I. I don’t paint, I don’t give a damn about who paints, I like walls with washes of various colors, and I will never hang either a painting or a poster in my home. Unless you spend your free time contemplating works of painting, I don’t understand what it means that "you haven't seen most of them." But then again, excuse me, what right do you have to speak? You’ve written a couple of crap— in the main section, not the margins— about cartoons, you've been around for just a few days, and you dare to give advice, and maybe you even hope that the people in charge won’t laugh in your face? Write 300 reviews, contribute for a few years, then, perhaps, talk about "what is right to do for the site, and what is not." I, for my part, don’t even remotely allow myself to judge; I find movies disgusting too, yet I don’t say "shut this or that down," it’s their business.
Voto:
Ah, and if the bootleg is by NOFX then we need to close the records section.
Voto:
<< That is, I look for a record I don’t know online, I buy it, and then I rate it >> And someone reviews a bootleg of Fuzzy Duck live in Amsterdam in '72, and you: you don’t find it, you don’t buy it, you don’t listen to it, you don’t rate it. It’s the exact same thing; with certain bootlegs, you might as well just see the cover, unless you spend a month searching for it online only to buy it for the modest price of 500 euros.
Voto:
In fact, I wrote "of the parents." I've been listening to Rap since I was in elementary school, for me this stuff is hilarious. Aside from the fact that musically it's really pathetic, the themes addressed are indeed a punch to the stomach, but like 120% of all militant rap since 1984. It's worth nothing.
Voto:
Since it exists again, you did well to review it on your own. <<< more inclined towards a canonical doom in the style of Cathedral >>> For me, it’s We Live that is the most "Cathedral"; this one is more "Saint Vitus" << (the shadow of Page and Iommi is ever-present) >> I don’t hear Page at all. Trouble, Vanilla Fudge (in terms of sound), Iron Butterfly, Coven, and many others, but Page has done other things. << "Electric Wizard" is an isolated episode in the band’s discography, >> All the albums are isolated episodes, always doom but all different in their similarity. << will never be able to produce high-quality works like in the early years of his career; >> How many early years? For me, the quality has always been high; the sounds change, but not the value. I don’t like the review for the Track By Track.
Voto:
I hope it's a joke, it sounds like the song of Spitty Cash's parents.
Voto:
If we really want to talk about innovation, you have to leave out the Led Zeppelin (don’t even tell me). One album for every innovative band would suffice: one by Zappa, one by the Floyd, one by the Silver Apples... and so on, because then the formula repeats itself. With 150 albums at most, you’d have all the music to listen to until death. A slow but relentless death that hits you in the balls at 18, on the day of the 150th album.
Voto:
I've only appreciated this album for a few years (maybe two), right since they became idiots. It's not a milestone, it's not innovative, but it's really a great Revival album like many I've been listening to long before. Some of the later stuff is okay, but this one is good all the way through. Of course, when I was younger, I thought they really sucked too: too much fame, too many big words.