puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7883 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Give me a link to a review where you truly discuss music; I have never read you. I’ve always read you discussing reviews in the technical sense of the writing or music in the general sense of fame. For instance, I have never read you write about a drummer (the one who plays the drums, usually sitting behind music bands during live concerts).
Voto:
And you insist on changing the subject, even though you reluctantly confirm my theory with "despite everything... they make me want to give up." But then what are you even doing here? I come here for the human side of the issue; it amuses me to see how people can find reasoning in the absolute subjectivity of music, contradicting themselves millions of times (sometimes consciously, sometimes not) and how they get upset over something that shouldn’t affect them at all ("X is better than Y," or even "your tastes don’t match mine"). But you? Repeating the same things to exhaustion, and every now and then trying to join the conversation while making the usual fool of yourself (like here, after all). Give me a because, 'ricchia de gaumma (for the unfortunate who might not catch the reference YouTube video non trovato4mgDscijhHc)
Voto:
Geeno, you’re the same old shit, blah blah blah, and you change the subject. You need to tell us what the hell you’re doing here if you never talk about anything, just about “records” and “music.” Not once have I seen you underline a piece, a title, a movement, a damn something at least remotely focused. You’re always there with “the music,” “the musicians.” Five years of vague nonsense all the same, and you have users who just arrived backing you up, only to disappear after a month, while you’ve been taking shit from the regulars for five years. To me, you’re a half-retarded masochist, no offense.
Voto:
It's a shame I have to leave. But it was beautiful nonetheless, as always. << sorry man, but - forgive the pun - who the hell told you that? >> You were veering into less interesting things, you would have distracted the audience.
Voto:
<< check for 10 minutes, >> Besides the fact that, damn, ten minutes to Google! what, are you using Hal 9000?
Voto:
Bartle, don’t distract me, you know he’s fragile in reasoning.
Voto:
Give us a because, rich in rubber.
Voto:
Geeno, but why? You've been on a music site every day for... 5 years? And for 5 years you've been annoying us with "modern fluff" against "the beauty of past albums." That said, I write a joke - because on a music site, saying that Meddle sold more than The Wall is a joke - you go check my joke (considering that you've been here for 5 years, you should at least know which albums are the most famous in history, since IT'S YOU who always talks about UNDERGROUND FLUFF) and then I'm the one who has to process my thoughts? You might be a normal person, perhaps, but I always wonder what you're doing here. You don't like music, you don't listen to it, you don't know it, you don't want to talk about it... why?
Voto:
"Of course I say it, not everyone is perfect like you?" The question mark there doesn't matter, it was either a simple period or an exclamation point.
Voto:
Flagello, don’t get mad; more than anything, I’m just laughing at that "of course it sold more than The Wall!" The "to be reassessed" was funny at first, but having you write something you don’t believe (since you said Meddle needs to be reassessed) and especially that doesn’t even exist, is among the top-tier laughs offered by the site. Along with, of course, geeno’s chronic late arrivals (sometimes he shows up on time, but either he’s off-topic or he hasn’t understood a damn thing).