El Guevo

The alleged Morgan has just made a list of clichés. I have already explained the reasons for mediocrity and also why this is a convenient operation. Those who have ears to hear.... Paying tribute to another artist is something that is quite common in the art world (and therefore also in the music world), and those who love music know this well; that’s why the speech of the alleged Prof. Morgan is not only useless but also stupid. There’s no need for him to teach us what we already know, using completely inadequate examples. Recreating the Mona Lisa is Art? No, it’s not art even if it’s done with perfection and love, but it’s not art. Is there really a need to recreate the Mona Lisa or any other famous painting? Was there a need to remake Psycho or Lolita or Solaris? Was there a need to make The Ladykillers? Is there a need to recreate Hot Rats, Kind Of Blue, Abbey Road, Beggars Banquet, Rain Dogs? Was there a need to make this album? Was it necessary? These are the questions to ask; everything else doesn’t matter.

Better the other on these two discs.

Great Review

There are other ways to pay tribute to an artist and a work. Someone has already expressed that this operation is just like what happens in cinemas with remakes. Commercial operations. The rest are just personal opinions; everyone listens to what they want. However, let's give Morgan what is Morgan's... which is almost nothing.

Everything has already been said about this album, but some things needed to be said here as well. Congratulations.

Morgan is clever; he has released an album of questionable artistic ability, an album that nobody needed. Morgan joins that long list of names trying to cash in on Fabrizio De André's name to gain the critics' acclaim and the badge of sensitive and intelligent singer-songwriters. However, it’s a shame that Morgan isn’t one of them. The habit doesn’t make the monk.

Great Primus