NanoG@zzolo

Here it is, now there’s even the cover. In fact, car_ anonim_, you started out very well, then you kind of stumbled on the album description, which you rushed through a bit too quickly, don’t you think? Anyway, congrats.

Alright, just send it to sadus@de-baser.com. Trust me, it works.

The movie isn’t bad, but it doesn’t deserve to be watched more than once: in fact, upon rewatching it, you end up appreciating it less and less. I would rather recommend reading the book it was loosely based on: "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" by Philip K. Dick. You’ll find that in Ridley Scott's film several elements from the book are left out that, in my opinion, add much more depth to the story. Let’s be clear, I am completely in favor of a film being totally independent from the book it’s based on; in fact, usually when I watch a film adapted from a book, I hope to find as little of the book as possible (with some exceptions: for example, "Io non ho paura" is beautiful precisely because Salvatores managed to refrain from putting anything of his own into the script). However, in this case, it seems to me that only the more "spectacular" elements were kept at the expense of a certain "spirituality" that characterizes the characters in the book. Read it (if you haven’t already) and let me know what you think.

Too many grammar nazis in here? No, it’s perfectly fine like this: dwarves don’t always see everything, so advice is welcome, but mistakes in the comments don’t count, damn it, or we’ll never get out of this. Let’s stick to pointing out mistakes in the reviews, alright?

Dear Mr. M@X: what is shameful here is - if anything - only your pompous comment. And who would the "competent" people be to write reviews on DE-Baser? Know that it is not up to you to decide that. No one here "demands" to write reviews; it is us who ask everyone to do so. Do you understand? Do you understand well? If yes, every future contribution of yours will be welcome; otherwise, you can calmly go screw yourself.

Does this editing come close to what you wanted? Anyway, "delusion" (last line) doesn't mean disappointment but illusion or hallucination.

I added "THE" - even though you explained why it was absent - because otherwise DE-Baser's artificial intelligence didn't link your review to the other one of Verve that its database already contained.
I don't know if I did the right thing - in fact, at the time they were called Verve and not The Verve, so I'm waiting for suggestions...

Bibiane, I took the liberty of correcting a few things here and there (well, I do that often, not sure if you noticed)... It’s true that personal style is nice, but it’s also important to be able to understand the meaning of what is written. The central sentence, the one that starts with "active, energetic" was quite messy and still needs to be revised: too long, break it up, break it up!

I tried to make a few corrections, but today I have little time. Is it easier to read?

Is the tracklist correct now?