Peppe Weapon

Until the analysis of the cartoon in general, I tip my hat: I completely agree with you, the Simpsons have been one of the greatest cultural phenomena of the 20th century, brilliant, irreverent, funny, innovative, they have completely overturned the concept of American cartoons, bringing to prominence an endless array of clones (among which the successful South Park, and especially, Family Guy, the best clone of the Simpsons ever made, precisely because it has managed, over the years, to differentiate itself by creating its own identity, and I’ll tell you, the latest seasons of Family Guy are slightly better than the latest seasons of the Simpsons, while the comparison collapses when we compare Family Guy with the early seasons of the Simpsons, where Homer and co. clearly win) and true iconoclastic movements. The score drops when you talk about the movie: alas, the film aligns with the superficial satire of the latest seasons: not spontaneous enough, too moralistic, contrived and prolonged... the early Simpsons were about immediacy, while the new Simpsons are rather "heavy," the movie included... unfortunately, I remember very little about the film, if not the overused gag of Spider-Pork, Homer's hallucinations about the snow, and a bit of the final scene... it’s a shame that the episode $pringfield (to mention what I consider the best episode of the series) is 100 times more fun and unforgettable than 1h30m of enjoyable film, but below the standards to which the Simpsons had accustomed us. It’s more of a 3.5 than a 3.

Better than Scarface for sure: less over-the-top, more human, more touching, more moral, less inflated... Scarface is an immense parable from power to self-destruction; I love it as a film, but I consider Carlito's Way even superior for the reasons I listed before. The review is perfect, it embodies 100% the philosophy of De Palma's film.

I have never seen Flor honestly, unfortunately I have stumbled upon Mondo di Patty a few times, and I knew this Flor was similar, curious, I wanted to see what it was about... but wasn't it a review site? XD Ah these fakes, you are getting more and more banal, we want something sacrilegious that makes us explode with laughter!!

I agree only with the statement about Robert Wyatt... on the rest, you won’t find me in agreement at all... yes, they were often 3 canonical minutes, but they weren't just simple verse-chorus-verse; it wasn't simple pop... it was visionary, lysergic music, with dreamy lyrics that fit perfectly with Manzarek's organ, which certainly made the songs even more acidic and "luciferine." The End is a descending parable into the hell of the mind; it's a continuous descent into madness and delirium, it's not mere self-indulgence, Morrison leads the band on his infernal journey, the Doors are not just Morrison, they are GUIDED by Morrison. And maybe on Light My Fire you aren't entirely wrong, but it's definitely more than just simple Easy Listening.

Of course, in 2005 I was really naive; only now do I understand their absurdity, and I adore them, both because they are all technically very good and because their absurdity is not simple—there's always a criticism hidden towards someone or something, approaching it all with a lot of irony without taking themselves too seriously. In 2005, I didn't understand a thing, I tell myself that xD

I lower your review by two points because you didn't mention "Pipppero(R)"... and that's a serious blasphemy. For the rest, an amazing album, technically incredible, that doesn't take itself too seriously. The best absurd band out there, followed by Squallor and Tony Tammaro.

The problem is that artists from one genre are compared to artists from other genres. Michael Jackson, like Elvis Presley, was driven by the major labels and record producers, who, since the days of the Jackson 5, recognized the innate charisma of the late Michael... the issue is that those with a certain musical culture relate Jackson to rock, hard rock, metal, jazz, prog, new wave, and whatever else, while he should be considered a POP artist, who sang songs that mixed the disco music popular at the end of the 70s (Off The Wall) with the electronic pop of the early 80s (Thriller)... he never composed anything original, but he rode the waves of the music of those years with "moonwalking" and various dances... just because he was already a star when he was a kid doesn’t mean he was necessarily a favorite... he had charisma, a good voice, and was a rather distinctive dancer, and this album should be taken as a "disco music" record... this user is the usual Scaruffi fan that rates it a 0 claiming to provide arguments, when all we get are a bunch of "it sucks," "it’s ugly"... why? Your review is directed, first and foremost, at those who do NOT KNOW THE ALBUM, and a string of "it sucks," "it’s ugly" is just bad publicity; you don’t tell us the reasons you think that... maybe because music is one of those arts where appreciation is mostly subjective, but the fact remains that those who give bad publicity will eventually receive bad publicity, and in my opinion, that's what you've done. You’re the usual follower of Scaruffi, and thus, this review, in my view, is more useless than a toothbrush for the toothless. Speaking of the album, like all of Michael's albums, it has never driven me crazy, but it is definitely a catchy album, and it’s designed for dancing. And then to say that Human Nature is an abomination is, for me, a blasphemy of inhuman proportions... ok, it’s not the best technically, but it’s definitely an enjoyable song. DizionarioRock? I think you’re Scaruffi himself :D

The review is a bit monotonous and short; you spent too little time on the songs, and the grammatical form is not perfect, but it is an enjoyable review. The problem is that there are already fourteen of Ok Computer. The only album that I truly like by Radiohead, and perhaps the best record of the 90s.

An eclectic artist: he ranges from the romantic genre to the absurd, crossing flashes of grindcore and jazz-fusion. Besides having composed some of the best melodies ever, he is also a television presenter and has been an actor/impressionist on the show "Il Grande Bluff". Many have attempted to imitate him (Gianni Drudi, Marco Marfè, Bathory, Queens Of The Stone Age), failing miserably. A "unique" artist. (In every sense). Well, reviewing Pupo with a technical and derogatory assessment would have been predictable and boring; better to have a review like this :D

Coolermaster, from prog suite, do we want to talk about Moon In June?