jack daniel's

DeRank : 1,05
DeAge™ : 6096 days • Here since 30 september 2009
The Who Live at Leeds
Voto:
Well, we're not accountants, but if you claim that the Who already gave their all in the '60s and then you mention an album from '71, well, if you allow me, you're contradicting yourself. Besides, they also made Quadrophenia in '73, then Who by Numbers... it doesn’t seem to me that the Who's career stopped in the '60s. As for Led Zeppelin, what can I say, I adore them, but I don’t think they were more gifted than the Who; each band had its own style, they were different.
The Who Live at Leeds
Voto:
<< they belonged to the '60s that ended on a high note with Who's Next >> Yes, too bad that Who's Next is from '71; did the '60s close in '71? Something doesn't add up. << There were already Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, Black Sabbath >> What the hell does that have to do with it?
The Beatles Live at BBC
Voto:
enough, you've broken my balls
Gore Verbinsky The Ring
Voto:
I don't know, I liked it a lot. I've seen the original too, but I definitely prefer this one.
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Don Giovanni
Voto:
oh, the return of the wolf gang!
Oasis Time Flies...1994-2009
Voto:
In short, I prefer these, in my opinion
Metro Metro
Metro Metro
3 nov 10
Voto:
The review is, as always, flawless, the two in the picture look like they just stepped out of a parody of a Brazilian telenovela
Pink Floyd Masters of Rock
Voto:
@ IVA Community: so are you the anonymous LEO from this fantastic de-page? Ummagumma - Pink Floyd - Recensione di Torre Ste1
Red Hot Chili Peppers Californication
Voto:
If this is a ridiculous record, then I am Mickey Mouse.
Dimmu Borgir Abrahadabra
Voto:
good job, but never as good as the lollipops