jack daniel's

Dear and illustrious Great Chief, I was just wondering whether this writing of yours is a recensioux or a recherokee.

Great SRV, I know the collection, let's say it's so-so, it's not exactly a best of, there are some fantastic tracks, others lesser. But surely SRV never sucks.

@ Fiquata, but that’s exactly where you’re wrong. Tell me, when it comes to discussing genocide, what is the minimum threshold of victims? If it’s six million, that’s fine, but if it’s three million, it’s not genocide? And what is that, a massacre? You focus on the numbers, yet you bring up nonsensical figures—first it was six victims, now it’s down to two. Do you really think it all reduces to a handful of units? No, because your argument would only hold if everything were reduced to just a few units. << I don’t think the eyes of the survivors contain the DATA OF THE DEAD >> There you go, you don’t care about the truth; you’re interested in nitpicking the dead, which is quite different. I never called you a communist, a fascist, or an anti-Semite; I called you a revisionist because that’s what you are—don’t change the cards on the table, don’t add other meanings to my words just to create confusion. That won’t work with me. Then, being a revisionist in itself isn’t even a negative thing; the problem arises when the revisionist mixes in irrelevant things and presents them as evidence, as if trying to prove something that only they can see. I know that the number of dead is important, but the order of magnitude (tens, hundreds, thousands, millions) is what truly matters, not the exact number—the exact number doesn’t change anything for you. Didn’t Primo Levi count the dead? Well, someone else counted them if I’m not mistaken.

@ LARROK, oh my gosh, indeed what you said makes a big difference, yes, very human the ss, before burning them they made sure they were dead, I mean they did all the clinical tests to ascertain death had occurred, right? I mean really meticulous and precise. I would say that your clarification changes, in fact completely rewrites the story. But please. Nice little detail, sort of necrophilic, anyway. @ TAXIRIDER, I clearly did not have anything against you, nor against what you wrote, I think that’s clear, also because I never mentioned you, but I reiterate it.

You don't see anything revisionist, I do. The moment someone has the indecency to associate the word "phantasmagorical" with the victims of the Holocaust, they are a revisionist, and it's not neutral. Period. << can't one insinuate that fewer died? >> Well, you could also insinuate that the Moon is square, but then if someone points out that you're talking nonsense, that's just how it is. Can you explain the difference between 6 million people burned alive and five million people burned alive? Come on, I'm curious. The outbursts of humanity, when people are reduced to cold statistics, are not at all out of place. I would do it another three billion times, only I also have my own business to take care of every now and then.

What does Palestine have to do with it? I know the disgrace that Israel has been causing for years with the illegitimate occupation of territories and everything that follows, but what does it have to do with it? One thing is Israel and its politics, another thing are the MILLIONS of Jews (and not just Jews) burned alive, BURNED ALIVE. No offense, Tarpit, but it seems to me that you’re talking a bit nonsense.

@ Tarpit. There must be some sort of brain contact between you and fiquata, since every time he’s in the mix, you show up. That said, CAN YOU READ?, who ever said this topic is a taboo? It’s a taboo if there are idiots who make it a mere numbers game, not a taboo in general. Who ever said “denier”? I said revisionist, do some research on the difference between the two before you drop your usual pointless comments. Anyway, Tarpit, Panico already told you once, you lack culture, so what do you want, go back to listening to Dinosaur Jr. Genius? Me? No, thanks, I’ve just met more people than you. Skeletron has made very intelligent, precise, and balanced comments, and what you often label as “right” as if to say something that might interest the global community, has shown much more intelligence and culture than what you try to flaunt, without succeeding. In fact, I said I agree with him, certainly not with that clown who associates the word “phantom” with the victims of the Holocaust. For me, the topic isn’t taboo in itself; it becomes taboo when people so ramped up think they’re God just for having read a couple more books than the national average of Turkmenistan.

I quote Skeletron, from A to Z. @ Fiquata, do you want the truth? Try looking into the eyes of some survivors, if you know any, there lies all the truth you seek, the one that none of your fucking readings will even come close to touching. These revisionist talks of yours make me want to vomit. << if only six Jews had died instead of the mythical six million, would we be talking about the holocaust? >> Mythical? MYTHICAL? Go fuck yourself! Your neurons are mythical.

Damn, after a quick visit to Pornhub, I've been back on Debaser for about five minutes, but your comment, jojoe, was enough to fill me up with bullshit. I'm done for today; I'm good like this.

Wow, what a page! There are some of the wildest anonymous comments ever, I’m cracking up, starting with comment 31 from LEO—it's pure de-baser magic. The ending with the various leos: 2 la vendemmia, riccardo stramarcio, batman, barman, susanna tutta panna. I'm dying here!