jack daniel's

DeRank ™: 1,05

DeAge™ : 6097 days • Here since 30 september 2009

Love Contact

Johnny Cash Live At Folsom Prison

30 may 10

Voto:

beautiful, this is the concert at San Quentin are exceptional

Depeche Mode Ultra

30 may 10

Voto:

I liked them for a while, then I abandoned them.

You’re really going for it. And to think I haven’t even written a single review yet; I’m just here for free until they kick me out. However, if you have any that you don’t need and you lend them to me, I won’t take offense.

Izzy Stradlin and the Ju Ju Hounds Izzy Stradlin and the Ju Ju Hounds

30 may 10

Voto:

beautiful, but I don’t know the disculo

Roxette Don't Bore Us - Get To The Chorus! Roxette's Greatest Hits

30 may 10

Voto:

good quality pop-rock

Jeff Beck Flash

28 may 10

Voto:

Bang!

The Rolling Stones Exile on Main Street

27 may 10

Voto:

<< Chuck Berry's little rock >>...too bad that without that "little rock" by Chuck Berry, the Rolling Stones probably wouldn't have existed at all.

The Rolling Stones Exile on Main Street

27 may 10

Voto:

"The first decade of a career is worth more than the careers of U2, Who, and Led Zeppelin combined..." Mmm... U2 is acceptable, but not Who and Led Zeppelin at all. The review is rather poor because, rather than discussing the Stones and this beautiful album, you use half of the text to discredit those you don't like. You say you own a thousand or two thousand records, but I think a mature listener would never dream of making such superficial comparisons between genuine giants. In short, Who and Led Zeppelin are not inferior to the Stones; you can say you like them less, and that's fine—tastes are tastes—but it doesn't mean they are worth less. It’s a clash of titans; you can't dismiss one side or the other so trivially.

Pink Floyd Wish You Were Here

24 may 10

Voto:

What’s frustrating about the review is that "Rating: 6" placed at the end. In my opinion, with a rating system from 1 to 5, the correspondence in tenths shouldn’t be taken too rigidly; if it were, we’d only have 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and miss out on the intermediate scores, like 7 or 5. For me, a three-star review can fluctuate in tenths from 5 to 7; it should be seen as a rough indication, and much depends also on the words that accompany it, that is, the review itself. But then you get the clarification "Rating: 6," and it’s normal for someone to get a bit upset.