Truman

I was one of those who wanted to understand how the moves were really done, to then imagine the scene in which, triumphing over my friends, I would say "but this move is done with up down right left punch kick left right..."; almost always it ended with me taking a lot of punches without doing anything, I got annoyed and started to fidget out of frustration. Tatatatatatatatatata...

Remarkable how it manages to mask a mundane story behind cutting-edge gameplay and a top-notch atmospheric rendering; the graphic novel is truly well-executed. A somewhat mixed review, 4 for the effort.

a few girls and many hamsters (!)
The first series was fantastic, the second was a bit inferior, perhaps due to a certain tendency to romanticize... I don’t consider the third. I remember my subscription to the second series expired at #17 (and they decided to end the series with #18, if I’m not mistaken)... what a month of pain.
The mail definitely deserves a note of merit. As a former subscriber of Topolino (I still read the old issues, I have a ton), I’ve come across some more recent magazines, and the quality has definitely declined...
Shall we also mention that magnificent typeface by Leonard Vertighel? I’m sure it would spark a debate on aestheticism, from Phaedrus to the present day.

Ah...

This is the best! Unfortunately, I haven't read the book, but the description of Berlusconi as a "democratic counterbalance" is truly one for the books.

I don't know the album, I'll try to listen to something.
The review is mixed.

Exciting.

However!

One of those artists where every time I listen to something I think "oh, I absolutely need to get something!" and yet I still don't.
Thanks for the recommendation. I won’t vote for the album because I’ve only listened to scattered songs by Gallagher, and I don’t even know if they’re from this album.
Greetings to the reviewer, good, bad, or at times.

Look, no one criticized him for his use of humor. Simply put, if it's true that there's a criticism of bourgeois conventionalism, it's equally true that one cannot extract a critique from each of Adams' paradoxes ("The guide is infallible. It is reality that is often inaccurate": does it mean that man is too attached to scientism, believing that everything written in a book is right? It follows that Adams himself might be unreliable. Paradoxical, very interesting, but in contrast to the whole book which is based on the validity of the guide => Adams, therefore, approved?)
Going deeper, every book has many more themes than can be read. Everyone can read as they wish, but I can't list all the themes that come to mind while reading.
My mistake, my reviews are vague; I often omit something I could have usefully mentioned: I will remedy that.
Best regards.