Yosif

DeRank : 1,70
DeAge™ : 6422 days • Here since 10 november 2008
Pantera Vulgar Display Of Power
Voto:
Well, I read it again: typos aside due to haste, but why am I always right about everything? Why is it always so irrelevant to argue with people who don't know how to debate anyway? And who always want to be right? Cooloras aside, the rest of those who commented didn’t express a single serious concept. Those who attack personally. Those who insult. Those who just shout "long live the panthers." Bah, what a shame these confrontations are. My post is unassailable, 100% right on my side. I want to see what nonsense will come out tomorrow in an attempt to be right. I'm curious. Night :)
Pantera Vulgar Display Of Power
Voto:
Of course, the brutal talk was aimed at certain users who are quick to give 5 to those discacci, which are no less than this. * Regarding the technical discussion, it was obvious I was only referring to metal. Attacking classical music is clearly unthinkable, and it's the only right thing you've said in that post; it requires the utmost skill. Regards -
Pantera Vulgar Display Of Power
Voto:
cooloras, it's a conversation with neither head nor tail; I can easily say the same thing you said to me, referring to Avril (whom I detest, just to be clear). After all, it's a product that’s well-played, okay, well-mastered, okay, nicely packaged, etc., etc. The limitations of products like Avril are evident to everyone; it’s not that it sucks outright, it’s just that the sugary tone, the character, the irritating voice, the pointless melodies are what ruin it. That doesn’t take away from the fact that it remains a product a thousand times superior to any random brutal album (which has nothing to do with music) [even though I repeat that both Avril and brutal albums are a solid 1 for me], but according to your reasoning, Avril wouldn’t be cataloged as "shit" [[just like Pantera are, indeed, music with neither head nor tail] [[[and to connect with the next post by ilmigliore, I repeat that I don't judge the genre negatively by default, or out of prejudice, unlike people who can't see beyond; something in the metal field has still appealed to me, and I believe I even have one among my favorite reviews]]] so the argument doesn’t hold water. Moving to the clothing topic, it was a discussion I clung to, listing Greg’s qualities against Phil's uselessness; I brought it back in because it fit with the comparison, but for me, it’s clear that look doesn’t matter (you say it doesn't matter, then I don’t understand how 90% of the comments on groups like Tokio Hotel or fucking emo bands often attack their type of aesthetics). Consistency comes first. Many who respond on this page don’t even know where it stands! I mentioned the 13-year-old fan discussion to get ahead of things, since a post in the style of ilmigliore would surely have come out talking about "oh but you listen to this, that, stuff for this and that reason)" ((in this case, a certain punk rock can be appreciated (more or less by teenagers) just as Pantera do)). Returning to the post by ilmigliore, metal and classical music are the genres that require the most technical skill? That’s a good one; what do you say about jazz or certain electronic avant-gardes? It's you who, with what you've said, are demonstrating a rather closed mindset. I don’t have a problem with metalheads; on the contrary, to stay on topic, there are some nice and open-minded ones here (not your case, for sure), unlike those who sell me this crap as a masterpiece; are you kidding me? (!) Pantera [you who quote "MTV stuff"] one of the most commercial bands around, and they’ve sold more than the MTV groups you give 1-1... you who act so picky when reviews of commercial albums are published on your homepage (!). I don’t know, frankly I don’t understand, but anyway I don’t feel like delving into this discussion, you’re wrong about everything you’ve said, just come to terms with it. icnarf, yet another user who, instead of arguing like cooloras, comes out with insults; well done, I could do the same about your hair (?), but unlike katharsis & co, I don't. Take example from cooloras. With this lengthy post, I’ve said everything I needed to say, any further replies will therefore be superfluous; the answers are all right here. I’m going to sleep; don’t fight too much to praise this little group. (: Regards. Yosif.
Pantera Vulgar Display Of Power
Voto:
I've read those "clichés" so many times in so many reviews (try reading Tokio Hotel, My Chemical Romance, Hilary Duff, Finley) and various trash. I don't see much difference with Pantera. Just because you like them, it doesn't mean we have to deny the evidence. For example: among my favorite bands are Bad Religion; I have no problem saying that they also have many teenage, acne-ridden skater fans among their large and varied audience. The same goes for Pantera, with the difference that for Pantera, it constitutes a good 80% of their fans, and speaking of leaders, Greg is a monster, both as a lyricist, and as a singer, and in terms of ideals, even his clothing (he dresses like a perfectly normal neighbor, without any pointless labels), not to mention his position as a professor of science and biology at the University of Los Angeles, definitely not your average ignorant, studded dude; Phil is a crazy idiot who at 40 still has nothing better to do than dress like a clown, sing ridiculously, and pretend to be an angry metalhead. Keep it up.
Pantera Vulgar Display Of Power
Voto:
(cit.) 8)
Pantera Vulgar Display Of Power
Voto:
ps: Ingrandisci questa immagine (HEADBANGERS are not all the same, NO.)
Pantera Vulgar Display Of Power
Voto:
@ 36: but where do you see the angry stuff on this album? Do you really just need 4 cheesy riffs and a pseudo-aggressive Phil to get hyped? Come on, I have a review that fits perfectly, THIS is angry stuff, try to say otherwise :D -> Nowhere to Hide - The Virus - Recensione di Yosif
Pantera Vulgar Display Of Power
Voto:
Sure, sometimes you guys are really funny, what the hell, can I give a 1 to a band that deserves such a rating in my opinion? Of course, when the users who are now butthurt (not even the Tokio Hotel fans) rate various amiciscialla, Avril Lavigne, etc., it’s all good. Sure, when it comes to slapping a 1-1 on the review for Eminem (I’m citing the first recent 1s that come to mind), we go wild! I repeat, just like these last ones deserve a 1, this CD deserves a 1 for me too, and mind you, years ago I had the misfortune of listening to it, despite NOT following metal (hell), and if we’re talking about commercial and predictable bands like the Pantera in question, then it’s even worse. I second comment 26.
Alkaline Trio Good Mourning
Voto:
Welcome reviews on this genre, which is rarely addressed on these pages. Or are the pages on negligible bands (where, by the way, everything has already been said online) like Il Teatro degli Orrori better? I don’t understand why always criticizing, for God’s sake. @ rece: they have never excited me, the review is good.
The Rolling Stones Sticky Fingers
Voto:
The Stones and the Beatles are nothing but the most overrated bands in history. Oh, I almost forgot Metallica and Led Zeppelin. The review is fine.