Yosif

"they dominated away" : wrong. only in the first half hour, in the second half they were nothing. c. ronaldo neutralized by an 18-year-old (immense santon). they might have dominated at the beginning and j.c saved our ass, okay, but to talk about complete dominance is a stretch. had fun yesterday rooting against them? good luck tomorrow with werder ;D

@cpt: 0-0 is a good result for any little team, but Inter cannot play like a provincial team at home like they did yesterday. We should have taken at least a 1-0 home win. Old Trafford won’t be easy; of course, we have 2 favorable results out of 3, but we need to change our mentality and position Samuel (I hope he recovers) in the center, Patrick instead of Muntari, and Balotelli instead of the lamppost Adriano. It’s unacceptable that players like Ibrahimovic, Maicon & co never step up in the Champions League. All 3 Italian teams out? I think Inter will make it; I have faith in Mou, who knows United at home well. The gobbi have some chance against a weakened Chelsea. Roma is already out. @bartle: I'll accept anything; I’m not complaining, just trying to understand such editing, and I still believe that putting images of a known or assumed person instead of an unknown user, despite not being accepted by Deb's guidelines, is the wrong move, a somewhat dictatorial attitude, quite out of place on a free site like this. If images can’t be posted, then they shouldn’t be posted at all, period.

cptgaio :D *

I don't know, I don't get it cptgayo, but anyway I trust. They should take a good hard look at themselves instead of complaining, setting up Rivas against ManU, are we crazy? Muntari inside and Vieira at home? In the first half, no one showed any guts, except for Santon and JC; better in the second half also thanks to a great Cambiasso. Let's see this great motivator in the return leg. Yesterday was a disappointment.

He didn't complain! At least, I repeat, based on what I heard yesterday in the post-match. If he said anything about it today, I'm not aware, because I didn't watch Studio Sport or hear his statements the next day.

So please, let’s not make things up… it's obvious that here editing works through friendships and so on; I got that a while ago. But to talk about pseudodisparagement "on purpose" and so on, that’s a different story. :)

Hi, I happened to write / hypothesize that the editors made some messes "on purpose"? I literally wrote "if the editors have messed something up now, I wouldn't know." That is a supposition; it can happen when editing particularly "full" HTML since there were images, different fonts, etc. The referee? Aside from the too many fouls against us, he officiated well. To be objective, the penalty on Adriano wasn't justified. It doesn't seem to me that Mourinho complained about the referee, at least from what I heard yesterday in the post-match. If he made any other statements today, I don't know.

already read, and replied, MonsieurSfascia responded, and wrote (as I expected) that images are not accepted in reviews. obvious, but then why were they accepted in other reviews, moreover with the help of the editors (bartleboom in that case)? mysteries.

I liked something about them! But they always seemed a bit impersonal and somewhat anonymous to me.

@ editors: why did you remove the images?!? I understand the last ones may have been superfluous, but the ones at the beginning about the no control-about time comparison and Jason's death were perfect for the context. I would like some explanations, besides understanding why other users can attach images to their reviews, while I cannot. Maybe because Bartle or whoever edits doesn’t appreciate my proposal compared to other reviews? Or perhaps, like everything else in ItaGLia, it works on meritocracy, favors, and connections? @ cynic: I tried all the links when I wrote, and they worked; if the editors have messed something up now, I wouldn’t know.