Yosif

When will it end, 230 years of still pumping themselves with steroids?

it's a fake alternative, I can't stand it

MAY 16 * !

@taurus: I’ve heard all those bands scattered over the PoR, M15 (terrible), HFH, and some other random stuff; I never liked them too much. I appreciate Lagwagon a bit more, but from the albums (I’ve listened to almost all of them), I only moderately liked the one with the chick on the cover that features May 15. Rise Against is nothing special. But I didn’t say they suck, mind you; I wrote they’re clones, with fluctuating quality, questionable, and anyway lacking personality. It’s clear they can’t be compared to the garbage of Sum 41, Good Charlotte, and various little bands; those really do suck maximum. I’m waiting to read the new one on Lagwagon. PS I’m an Interista; did you swear enough yesterday? :D

Guys, hold on a moment, but why do we have to speculate and be hypocritically virtuous when it suits us? I don't know who Trell is (I just get that he was a user who has passed away), nor do I know what happened in the chat (I never enter), but now getting upset over alleged disrespectful comments regarding his death is incredibly hypocritical: I mean, do you realize you’re saying the same things about comments? "I can't stand it, when the hell does he die" (comment from starblazer about nonricordocherece, and anyway recurring in various forms on other reviews of artists who might not be liked) "but when does this vasco/tokiohotel/marcocarta or whoever kick the bucket?" (typical), "I hope you get cancer" (a user on a review seems to me of gustavotanz) "icnarf is cancerous" (user katharsis) and dozens of similar examples, even the same applies to him, with insults often going over the line. So don’t twist this around. It’s easy to be virtuous now, for someone who was known. Be mature.

black, blues, is it really necessary to continue the usual story here as well? :D and then you talk about insults, come on, let's be serious, you are the first one who constantly insults in these endless flames that have seen you as protagonists for quite some time now! It’s quite curious how the editors, instead of calling for calm in these long discussions or banning those like trotadamare who contribute nothing to the site except for childish comments, come out with "I'm fed up, go ahead and massacre each other, etc." The funny thing is that they even read them and reply. Get it together! DE-SALUTI

You’re not entirely wrong, bluespower, but continuing this sterile debate about it seems counterproductive to me; giving too much importance could inflate the aforementioned user's vain nature to unimaginable levels. If he gets the images, I couldn’t care less, I repeat, I have nothing against him, but I remain astonished by the "bizarre," let’s call it that, Debaser editing system. If the images are not accepted IN THE RULES, it’s better not to provide them to anyone. It’s that simple, right? Did he really ask to not have the review posted online? Terrifying. The editors? There will be about twenty of them, two have even passed through here, but no one has yet edited the 2 non-functioning links on this page. And why not include a function to self-edit reviews, rather than dealing with editors, editing, emails, info, etc.?

you’re not entirely wrong cpt, apart from the season with Cuper, we’re typically struggling in Europe. But talking about it now makes no sense, let’s see in 15 days, and we’ll be able to share our thoughts. I’m not very hopeful, but we can advance if we play like we know how. If you say so, it’s fine for someone like him to say it; it can only provoke loud laughter, considering he plays on the muddy fields of Lugano on Thursdays, and he has lost about 50 points in 3 years since Inter, plus he runs a ridiculous club that revolves around trading cards, worthy of his mafia-like president. :) Anyway, in 15 days we’ll know more.

In fact, I didn’t complain. I asked for explanations, which were not provided. That is: you see the images, yes. Any other user does not. A choice that is not easily understandable.

I correct myself: "accept the images," not "put the images." Is this better? (: