Yosif

DeRank ™: 1,70

DeAge™ : 6421 days • Here since 10 november 2008

Love Contact

The Chemical Brothers Further

18 jun 10

Voto:

I remembered well ;D
UHUHPANICOUHUH | June 20, 2009, late night | Rating: 5 | Album Rating: 1

Come on, with all the great stuff coming from Kanada, this music creator for the drugged-up... please, don’t misunderstand my 1, it’s a 1 from a genius, evidently not understood by me. Almost better than Gigi D'Agostino, at least he puts his heart into it! :P
(1 avenger) (0)

Karlheinz Stockhausen Michaelion

18 jun 10

Voto:

Always immense, GiovanniA. Given your target, have you ever thought about discussing Maestro Russolo? Who better than you could?

The Chemical Brothers Further

18 jun 10

Voto:

-6- title + blogspot on Google and you should find it at 320. Am I wrong or did your "easy criticism" also hit Venetian Snares in a review here? :D If you don't like the good (?!) Aaron, I doubt you’ll enjoy this from Architect (2,3 tracks are in that "brain-dead" style, in fact Venetian, before stabilizing on Planet Mu, released on the same label)!

The Chemical Brothers Further

17 jun 10

Voto:

But come on, I used to love the Chemical Brothers until a few years ago, but after "Come With Us" they've always missed the mark. The fact is that on many big albums (IDM electronic stuff, etc.) that come out, it's always the same usual suspects getting reviewed... there was already a review with 60 comments just 2 days ago :D PS: when I say big albums, I mean stuff like number 6 in my 2010 ranking (Haujobb, no joke!) -> link rotto annoying yet mental-atmospheric electronic music at the same time, crazy breaks, heavy distortions, ambient synth sounds, etc... give it a listen ;) maybe in a few days I'll put up a review ______

The Chemical Brothers Further

17 jun 10

Voto:

Damn, 5000 records come out every month and you can't find anything better than to review further twice in 4 days (there will surely be another 3 or 4)? Anyway, genuinely a small thing but I expected it; the Chemical Brothers have been lost for a while. I'm reposting the comment on the other review -> I gave it a listen, few good finds (above all the printer-like synth you mention on snow, brilliant, the big train horse power) but for the rest, absolute disappointment. From these over-the-top comments, I expected more! Too too too pretentious (many even sound like those progressive house tracks that have been going around for a few years). For me, a 2.5.

The Chemical Brothers Further

17 jun 10

Voto:

I gave it a listen, a few good ideas (especially the printer-like synth you mention on "snow," brilliant, the great train horse power) but overall, absolute disappointment. From these enthusiastic comments, I expected more! Too, too, too posh (many even sound like those progressive house tracks that have been around for a few years). For me, a 2.5.