Yosif

Oops, it's true I wrote 2000 TB instead of GB :D well, it's clear that it was unthinkable and obviously a mistake. It would be impossible. ;) de-cordially yours, Yosif

-57- the single is indeed a piece of shit, but it doesn't make sense to rate an album when you only know one song, seems obvious, right?! ;) - 55- 2000 tb? are you crazy? where the hell am I supposed to find 2000 1 gb hard drives = 2000 tb :D NOT EVEN BERLUSCONI, I wrote 2000 gb (2 tb), read better instead of making infantile and banal web insults, but if, as I believe, you're just a lazy teenager, then I accept the provocation; at that age, it’s hard to reason civilly. As for the user yosif being "mortally annoying" to you, I gladly accept that, the wise undersigned accepts everything, I’m not bothered or warmed by judgments from people I don't even know. Yosif thinks and would gladly avoid discussing with the typical faux angry teenager upset with the world, so annoyed by the nasty commercial genres when he doesn’t know that metal is the third largest genre in terms of sales and exposure (compared to what’s reviewed here) and is more publicized on a global scale. Just look at some radio, TV charts, and sales data from the USA and worldwide, don’t count the pathetic Italy because we’re just 2% of the world. De-regards and de-wishes to you too xyz, I leave you to unwrap mommy's gifts. Yosif

I read the review; it's exactly how I like it: beautiful, descriptive, and concrete without getting lost in unavoidable literary ramblings. I don't know the album, but the 5 in the review fits perfectly. De-auguri.

The review isn't bad; I've seen the character in a couple of things on YouTube and Google Images. He seems like the usual ridiculous, deconstructed, indie-addicted clown we've seen many times before. I don't understand why that faggot Bill Kaulitz gets slammed (which I agree with) for dressing like that, while this one is considered "a genius, curious, interesting guy," etc. From what I've heard musically (just one video), it seems shallow, so it would be appropriate to include the samples. In any case, it's a proposal to evaluate; character failed.

Welcome, for being only 15 years old and this being your first review, it's okay, but there are mistakes that should not be made in a public review. Reviewing for a website is not the same as posting a comment on a forum or blog.
I'll list the errors honestly, even though I don't excel as a reviewer, but they are quite obvious:
- Avoid greetings like "hello, let me introduce myself, hi I'm new, I hope you liked it," etc.
- Avoid abbreviations like "song" and declarations like "my favorite song is" in the manner of an elementary school essay "my dog is beautiful, my dog is..."
- """track of which I do not personally know the source""" what does that mean?! It is the responsibility of the reviewer to inform themselves about what they are reviewing, and since you claim to have the original record, in the booklet regarding the credits for the track in question, it will state the label and the original piece that granted the rights for the cover: "sampled courtesy by" "title is a cover of title artist year of publication record label" is usually the order.
- Avoid statements like "it seemed to me, etc." You need to be sure of what you're writing and saying. The review is also a bit too brief.
Best of luck with your reviewing and improvement. Best regards!

I rather need to contact the editors to change the year; it came out as 2003 even though I clearly put 2006. I don't know, de-stranezze :D

Hi Sylvian, have you reviewed it too? :O I didn’t know, so you liked it, well it’s a good album. I just took a look at yours and I see that you kept to a concise overview (well done but a bit brief in my opinion). Mine is a bit more descriptive for anyone wanting to know it more deeply. My standard for a review is: to provide a short introduction about the band and the genre at the beginning, a description of the tracks that isn’t too verbose, and a conclusion with the overall judgment and general remarks. Do you think that’s tiring for the reader? I think it’s fine this way; I enjoy reading long reviews, and I prefer TBT to get to know an album. I ask you this because these are the first reviews I’m writing, but my goal isn’t really to make people read or discover it if they don’t know it. Rather, I want to provide a source for those who know it and are looking for opinions, so they would find a good guide to decide whether it’s worth a listen or a purchase. I believe that an additional review can only be beneficial for an album of this value. Best regards and best wishes!

It doesn't seem to me that other users limit themselves to "I don't like it," so I don't see why I should be the one to do it. As for the satanism discourse, how do you explain comments 1 and 3 then? I'm just curious. Bye.

-41- If I had done it out of spite, I would have put it in all your reviews; I only included it in the one album I listened to (which seriously deserved a spiteful comment or not). I never listened to the others, so it doesn't seem sensible or fair to me. I doubt you listened to this, despite your 1 :D -45- Same reasoning. And with this, I have replied to all of you, PD what a struggle (: ps for the metalheads, I would appreciate an answer to the question I posed here Theocracy - Theocracy - Recensione di XBend de-saluti

-39- it wears out; actually, I wanted to do this a long time ago, but I only discovered today while I was on IE that it didn’t work with Mozilla. :D I think it’s still a great business card, at least you understand the tastes, whether shareable or not, and I avoid repeating them.
-question 1-: yes, I meant heavy, you know, the basics (Black Sabbath, Maiden, and the like). - question 2 - the "not listening" category doesn’t mean that I’ve never heard anything from these genres, and that I shouldn’t appreciate at least 1%! I repeat that I always listen to everything before expressing myself (that’s why I haven’t categorized some genres that I respect for their depth but have never wanted or felt motivated to explore - like blues). The discussion about Transkarpatia is complicated; I can tell you that it’s a masterpiece, and more than an album, it’s an extrasensory journey, something far from the concept of a simple album, far from various growl double kick and dirty sound tracks. That album, besides being spectacular and well-played with top-level atmospheres (if you read a bit of reviews around, you’ll see that overall this is a shared judgment and the 5 stars are fixed), has its own story, it’s strainfluenced; inside it, you can hear gothic, symphonic, electronic, industrial, etc., which most black metal musicians don't do while sticking to their standard clichés. I wouldn’t even define it as that extreme; Transkarpatia, in certain moments, is also very light. It’s not the only album from genres I don’t prefer that I’ve appreciated; I also commented very positively on a doom album by Shape Of Despair. I repeat, when something is liked, it’s liked, period, even if commercial (Lady Gaga) or part of genres I don’t share (trnksrp); I have no problem admitting it. Too bad that in the case of black, it’s a isolated case in itself. To make you understand what deeply annoys me as a style is this, one of the most useless albums I’ve ever heard in my life, even though I’m someone who can also appreciate genres at 3000 bpm of pure kick like splittercore (give it a listen) - > Uterovaginal Insertion of Extirpated Anomalies - Cephalotripsy - Recensione di Tepes the average of 4 is scandalous, in my opinion.
-question 3- I’m shitting on the figure of metalheads and metalheads themselves; the fact that I like gothic and symphonic (and if you look at my initial comments, that’s the genre I’ve commented on the most) doesn’t strike me as strange, given that it occupies the most space on my shelves of over 3000 original albums and 2000 tb of pirated music. And since I’ve told you many times that I’m broad-minded musically. :) I like the genre from the crazy side, but even here I don’t appreciate all those damn clichés and standards you may know (in gothic, for example, there are abundant things like mood beauty and the beast, depressing themed lyrics, gothic looks, etc.). Settle down? Everyone on their own path? No way, comparison is fine; of course, when we don’t understand each other like here, it’s a bit of a hassle. I didn’t attack you; I’ve said several times that I don’t like having little discussions on the web; a 1 put out of spite or whatnot, a critique, etc., is fine, but far be it from me to come up with comments like the 13 and that of the multiple fakes on Debaser. I repeat, such a comparison with a reasonable person can only be productive, as long as we reach similar views like in this post 39. De-greetings.