Yosif

dots, I repeat that for me the discussion is closed here, I will continue to respond on this page only if we keep talking about estelle or shine, not for any particular reason, but simply because 100 comments about hd, metal, bitrate, collections etc. are pointless! For those who want to continue the discussion (I really hope not because I am thoroughly fed up), you can do so via private message, and I will respond there when I can, which is why I replied to your post 99 with a private message. Feel free to read it and see who is still right. Your calculation has a fundamental error, which is the data 1 hour. I repeat that rarely do records last only 60 minutes, my previous posts explain everything, the rest I wrote to you privately, now I have to run, take care and take a look at yourself, because with this attitude you are becoming a bit boring. Regards

eheh infected, muntari rulez :D - damn - yes, it's a duplicate, I actually have the original in my favorites, but it was really TOO short and succinct for a masterpiece like this! Besides, there are dozens of reviews for Dark Side of the Moon, Chinese Dem. etc., it's fine to have a second one for two pages. After all, it's a great album; in fact, I renew my invitation to listen to it. ;)

of course, 90 mb to be generous, because real discs of 75 or 79 minutes always take up 95, 97 as I showed you. if you're talking to me about discs (beautiful ones) but short like the early punk rock of Bad Religion, or some black metal that lasts 40, 45 minutes, etc., it's clear that you're mistaken. regards

-92- I’ll close the discussion here because I’m really tired of talking to a wall. I may have downloaded all that stuff and not listened to everything, but how can you not get it? I’ve listened to all the albums over the years, but I still have a ton of stuff (like these single tracks in the folders) that I’ve never listened to. I keep them for the collection and listen to some every now and then, since I already know them and I don’t have all that time to listen to this stuff. The chatter is pointless; I’ve shown you, data in hand, even with the screenshots, who’s right. I showed you that a 192 takes up 90 MB (I repeat, don’t talk about 40 min discs), so continuing this discussion seems practically useless to me. You say 200 gigabytes for a thousand discs? Impossible. 90 MB per ripped disc at a bitrate of 192 or 224 x 1000 ripped folders (the figure you mentioned) = approximately = 1 GB for 10 discs - 10 GB for 100 discs - 100 GB for 1000 discs - approximately (1 TB) for 1000 discs, excess approx. we’re talking about 9000 GB and beyond. I repeat, it’s MB GB, it’s impossible to have ripped 1000 discs on a 200 GB hard drive (unless you rip at 96 kbps). Now, is it alright to do the math like this as in elementary school? I believe there’s nothing more to say other than once again you are wrong. We can go back to talking about Estelle or Shine, but this collection MB TB discussion is pointless. Regards.

* obviously the covers don't even take up half a mb.

-88- You were talking about sharing? So can you tell me how I can share 4 hard drives of 500, if I only have one connected (and shared) and I don’t have multiple USB ports and the other ones are occupied by something else? It’s obvious that once again I’m right. -86- The normal discs at 192 are around 70? That’s not true, I repeat they’re around 95 to 100 (you shouldn’t speak based on those 40-minute discs like black metal!) I’ll give you proof with another stamp, a decent electronic group, the data is not modified, you can check it yourself by downloading it around. I repeat I don’t see why I should say nonsense, in fact, I don’t hide that I would gladly do without all this pirated material, however well compensated by all those original CDs. But if I had the opportunity, I would take everything original (of course, money isn’t infinite) regards.

* four-digit number

-86- it is with great pleasure that I welcome your post with hearty laughter while I enjoy a coffee-cigarette after a delicious meal. I feel a bit sorry for going back on my steps to respond to you, seeing how people cling to everything just to be right. I have to print for you otherwise we'll be here all night and won't understand each other. Right now, I have the HD loaded with some singles; I've divided the folders by year, and I’ve printed 2 for you with the corresponding -select all-. ->
Keep in mind that these folders start from the '80s, some are wider, some less, but always in double digits, and they include all possible genres. Are you happy? Now do you understand what I mean by folders with single pieces?! Now enough.

81 It’s pointless to throw around petty insults like a teenager or whatever; they don’t affect me at all, except to make me feel pity for a person who resorts to insulting on the web. Do you realize? It's one of the saddest things there can be. With this post, you demonstrate once again that you have no valid arguments. You don’t realize the nonsense you’re writing. Since 2001, I’ve owned a computer; I’ve used emule, kazaa, winmx, bearshare, torrent, mirc, private exchange, file sharing sites (megaupload, rapid etc.). How can anyone believe they can download 2 terabytes all at once???? Emule can't even handle 600 or 700 files in the queue (I’ve maxed out at over 1000 and the RAM literally went to hell despite having 2 GB of RAM). Essentially, this is an out-of-place and ridiculous post, just like the character who conceived it. With this, I want to put a definitive end to this discussion, not because I'm bored, but because I don’t see what else this debate could lead to except wasting time. Regards.

-80- I promised to wrap up the conversation, yet you force me to contradict you once again. Let's go in order: perhaps the black metal CDs of 40 min, ripped poorly at 128 kbps can take up 70 mb, normal albums at 192 or 256 sit around 80, 90, 100 if they exceed 75 min, more than 120 if they are 320 (the bitrate I prefer whether it's about downloading if found), or ripping from original CDs already in my possession). Second point: 4000? I repeat that the disks are more than 3000 (approximately we're around there, give or take a CD). I remind you that one third are SINGLES; a difference of 1000 CDs is not trivial, you know. Be precise. Third point: 28,000 disks??? READ WELL, I wrote 2 TB of pirated material, not 2 TB of pirated albums; from this, I notice that your real goal is not at least to engage in discussion and a pseudo-debate (never more failed than now given your poor skills in discussing civilly), but rather to try (in vain) to discredit me. Too bad because before this discussion, I checked your reviews and comments and noticed that you are among the most open-minded and have similar tastes. GIVING AN APPROXIMATE NUMBER, it will be just a thousand of non-original full albums; having 2 TB of music DOES NOT mean having 2 TB of just albums. I don't have videos or anything else (I keep them in my favorites on YouTube to avoid taking up more space), doesn't it occur to you that there could be folders of individual mp3s, singles circulating on mIRC, extended versions, ripped vinyls, a cappella versions? I have a folder of single songs, singles, etc., covering all genres of electronic music that alone occupies two 500 GB hard drives, not single albums. The other two 500 GB drives are just albums. The 80 GB drive is software and other installation material, etc. If you only keep compressed files of entire albums on your PC, it doesn't mean the rest of the world does the same. Think about it for a moment, set aside your childish insults, feel free to believe that it’s nonsense; I could easily provide you with the entire list of CDs I own if I had the time to transcribe it. I repeat, it's not in my interest to throw around nonsense and mock people on the web whom I don't even know. I won’t do it even in this case despite your insistence on being a keyboard warrior (a PATHETIC attitude, to be honest). If you want to believe in some grand scheme concocted by some "kid" (maybe), no one is stopping you. In fact, I’m starting to get tired; I wonder why I should discuss with someone who doesn’t want to understand and try to flaunt what I have and what I don’t have on my shelves and hard drives. 79 mistake, I've read worse. ;) Cheers.