JURIX

I haven't listened to the album, but the review is well written. However, this cover is just too beautiful!

NO no, wait a moment: someone has completely misunderstood me here. An HONEST record (I reiterate) in the sense of DIRECT, GENUINE, a live performance that’s the REAL deal, not reworked or faked with post-production effects. The same goes for the frills: I’ve seen Primus in concert a couple of times, and they focus solely on the music, which in my opinion makes the band even more admirable. The frills that some might like, but which I think are unnecessary additions (choreographies, lights, a polished look, speeches before each song) are absent in Primus. I gave it a 5 because there’s no 6; this live is magnificent!

They are amateur recordings, yes... and you can hear zioken! They haven't done any official live shows, what a shame. A band that is really worth seeing live.

Aside from discussions about what is punk and what isn’t, which are quite pointless, the CLASH and the SEX PISTOLS have made a significant mark in the history of English music. For different reasons. They can be liked or hated, sure, but when I read that Mick Jones's voice is modest... what are we saying? This is an excellent record, even though I liked "THE CLASH," what can you do... Why didn’t you vote for the album? I decided not to vote on your review because it would be well-written, but there are too many imperfections ("Working for a Clampdown" is not the title of a CLASH song); Strummer was the son of well-off people, but how many artists are, and what does that even matter? We always come back to this: do we judge the music? Or the rest?
Anyway, one of the most historically significant bands ever, they’ve influenced hundreds of groups and will continue to do so in the future.

I haven't listened to the album (even though I know one track out of the four), so it seems fair not to vote for it. The review is quite childish because why don't you focus more on the musical aspects instead of apocalyptic scenarios, upside-down crosses, and other accessories that have been flaunted by thousands of bands who sell (or only sell) thanks to this? One last question: where exactly is this cover supposed to be appealing?

Regarding the latest (and posthumous) album by RANS AND GOSIS, after 17 years, the best thing would have been not to release it. I don't know how many would be interested, aside from mere momentary curiosity.

The album is good, although I don’t think it deserves a 5. As for the review, you could have mentioned a couple of songs, made it more detailed; it seems a bit superficial, even though we all already know AC/DC. CHAO BEI!

Thanks everyone. Anyway, "Sailing The Seas Of Cheese" is definitely a 5, no question about it. I really like "Tales From The Punchbowl" as well. As for the live shows, I found online "Live At Agora Theater (Cleveland, USA) 1999.11.06" and "Live At Bikini (Toulouse, France) 1998.05.25," two decent live recordings, but unfortunately the sound quality is poor/bad. Still, I was blown away when I saw them in Milan (so many years ago...) and the concert was interrupted by a biblical downpour... CHAO BEI!

I've only listened to part of the album, so I think it's fair to only vote for the good review. But why don't you understand that this isn't an attack on Madonna, but an invitation to reflect? I really like the first album by SLIPKNOT, and I also like a lot of their later work, but from what they’ve done afterward, it’s clear that it was a project set up by the music industry. Death/black metal bands can be enjoyable, but I don’t think they walk around all day with spikes and face paint; it’s part of their job. Madonna, as a show business figure, is exceptional; she has created a brand, has made an era, but musically speaking, it's a different story. Besides not composing the beats and not writing the lyrics, I think even her vocal range is carefully managed by her (Highly skilled) entourage. Reflect on this.

One of the most original Italian singers for sure. It’s not my genre, but the album is nice. Chao