JURIX

Do you write like this for (presumed) kindness or are you just not capable of doing any better?

But do you vote for the chick based on the cover? It's hard, you can see very little. If you vote for how she actually is, then I'm out, I don't think I've ever seen her around.

Anyway, the cover is beautiful. A review as essential as a round-headed screwdriver. The record, well... maybe one day I'll catch a couple of songs on the radio, for now it intrigues me like an article on the Cogne murder case.

Here it seems that we vote more for the VASCO stereotype than for the proposed albums. This is Vasco's last decent record, then it’s complete nothingness. Anyway, Mr. Rossi has made 2-3 good albums (Colpa d'Alfredo, for example), but if we have to vote for him based on how he is today, with TIM commercial jingles and lyrics from delayed fourteen-year-olds... a 1 is mandatory.

Well, well... you know that I don't mind at all? Original.

@STONEY: you're 200% right! It's just that I feel bad hearing certain absurd talks, gratuitously violent and nonsensical. Anyway, let's stop giving this guy any attention.

Your OLD comment dug up from 15 minutes ago was the one where you said you have respect for those who blow up hospitals...

"but a historical analysis of religion leads in the same direction, namely towards the right side of Christianity": here is the tolerance and open-mindedness of the fundamentalists.
Why can’t I admire the man Jesus? Wasn’t he meant for Christianity? In the following centuries, certain episodes were selected, if not INVENTED (like the choice of the gospels that spoke less about the life of Jesus and more about abstract things), establishing over the years dogmas and rules that were not even remotely attributable to Jesus. Don't you think other religions can boast miraculous or magical episodes (similar to the ones you mention) to justify themselves? Because if one does NOT believe in reincarnation or UFOs, those are personal choices, but if someone questions the weeping Madonnas or the liquefaction of Saint Gennaro’s blood, they are a heretic?

"but why do you judge the faith of others? as long as it’s a discussion, that’s fine, sinking into insults is in very bad taste": SIGNORPROG, it seems to me that you are someone with whom one can discuss. Unlike what you have, for the umpteenth time, exalted—the murder of one (a singer, not a political or religious extremist) and posted comments on DeBaser that are worthy of denunciation. To me, as to many others, it doesn’t seem that I have personally offended anyone, but hearing certain discussions is concerning, as well as makes one cringe. To clarify, I do not consider myself an atheist, but I respect the choice, and I don’t think we need a ready-made religious belief into which to pour our indecisions to feel at peace with our conscience.
Why not exalt the deeds of Jesus the MAN (assuming one believes he existed) instead of the Jesus-DIVINITY created artfully at the various Councils of Nicaea, Trent, etc.? Why is it that every time questions are raised about the major monotheistic religions, the answer always harks back 2000 years when NOTHING was as it is today and the overwhelming majority of the dogmas to believe in were invented hundreds of years later?

I completely agree with SCORCIOPELOSO. Nevertheless, a magnificent and historic band.