Voto:
It always takes a bit of effort to read you, but here I find you very on point. The collective delirium is always a current topic, as recent news demonstrates. Interesting.
Voto:
I was thinking about it a few days ago while reading a despicable, masturbatory, and insipid review of Slint. On one hand, there are mental wanks passed off as reviews. On the other, users like you: hundreds of shares, and in all of them, you’ll know exactly what you’re going to listen to, whether you like it or not. Oh, and no duplicates. Have I ever said “thank you”?
Voto:
Surely not an exciting album. And it's not like Innerspeaker was worth tearing your clothes over. However, there are two enveloping tracks.
Voto:
Great great grand great album. Well done DeMa
Voto:
You understood everything.
Send them all out.
Voto:
The kind of "reviews" that are masturbatory and self-referential that I would never want to read. Don't take it personally. Terrible.
Reef Glow
20 feb 20
Voto:
Accomplice @[IlConte] I arrive centuries later, but I arrive. I might curse, but the very unique timbre of the singer reminds me of AC/DC. What matters is their wild simplicity, of which I am about to listen to more. Although the references to the Stones are, for me, disastrous.
Voto:
I have to admit this shortcoming. Due to the challenging language barrier, considering I juggle with school-level English. I imagine I would miss many nuances, so I gave up beforehand. Of course, I was familiar with the content and its targets, and this page encourages me while also honoring Lenny. An important page, Conte, one of the many you have written, that elevates this virtual space and gives me an opportunity.
Voto:
Oh, I tried, I listened to them. They sound too old for me, outdated. Also rather unoriginal. You are great as always.
Voto:
Recently discovered. The "punk" label in the genres misled me significantly. I was about to miss out on a damn gem, which in my opinion has very little to do with punk.