Voto:
But who the hell says that rugby shouldn't be played? Stop putting words in my mouth that I haven't said. I argue (among other things) that the eighty thousand in Milan are not a reflection of the popularity of this game (maybe, even though I don't like it) but the result of a media bombardment. To deny that sports are also a cultural matter related to the historical and geographical characteristics of the places where they are situated is superficial and shortsighted ANATAS.
Voto:
I’ve come to the conclusion. Just as in the USA soccer will never be followed and in Egypt they will never have skiing champions, rugby doesn’t fit our individualism. Hoping to be proven wrong by the facts. Bye and thanks.
Voto:
Your take on "dark side of the moon" I think is even more embarrassing. You win, know-it-all.
Voto:
Ridiculous was to "underline" according to the thesis of my review the senseless exodus. A further small provocation not directed at those who truly love this sport. By the way... have you noticed that none of those who were there just because it's cool had the courage to speak up? And I don't think it was because there weren't any...
Voto:
Ok gasta, caveman was meant to refer in a non-offensive manner to a "primordial" nature that is an essential component along with that of more refined tactics and scientific coordination. It's still one of the most recognizable traits of a rugby player... I think of Chabal... heheheh. I know, I know, they’re not all like the ogre, come on, have you forgiven me??? hehehe
Voto:
No, not you telespalla. But many got worked up without understanding the meaning of the review. I don't love it but I respect it a lot. I think I've demonstrated that in all my posts. Then if I say it’s a pain in the ass or that it hits like rhinos and we fight like blacksmiths, it's superficial but also to bring a smile, not to offend.
Voto:
Well, gasta, at a high level you have to be a bit of a brute and a caveman (and I say this without disdain) otherwise they'll tear you to pieces, my dear uncle. I'm all for "minor" sports; hopefully, this football-centric mentality will really change (even though I love football). I've never regarded the true fans of any other lower-ranked sport as REAL, mind you. I fear that the setting of Meazza had little to do with sports and with the true (noble) values of rugby and a lot to do with glamour and media conditioning. But I hope I’m wrong.
Voto:
I understand you. It's just that I don't like it; I prefer more spectacular and flashy technical gestures (according to my tastes). Rugby is the most team-oriented sport there is for me. Perhaps too much. That's all. Saying that a try isn't the pinnacle of spectacle seems like an insult to me, which feels really excessive. Don't you think you might be a bit sensitive?
Voto:
I tried to watch about ten matches during the Six Nations and the World Cup, but I never managed to see one to the end. I promise I'll go see one live, as I've already mentioned; maybe it's more enjoyable that way. I keep up with the results but I don't consider myself an "expert," having the humility to recognize that I don't master the more intricate mechanisms of the game and don’t know all the rules. I know something and I’m quite into sports. It’s clear that my intent was also provocative, but I didn’t mean to offend.
Voto:
Maybe I went a little overboard there. I was just trying to lighten the mood, wanted to tease you a bit, come on... wow, you true rugby lovers are so sensitive (except for Telespalla). I apologize, alright? Look, if someone told me that volleyball players look like butterflies chasing after butterflies with a net, I wouldn't take it to heart. I didn't mean to offend the players; I respect and appreciate you, okay? It takes a lot of courage to play, alright? But you can be a bit wild, for crying out loud! Peace?