Voto:
Yes Alfredo, I give up.
Voto:
Alright, freebird. I don’t think it was just the phone calls that were at Moggi’s expense, but much more, and everyone saw what happened on the field despite Juventus having a team that didn’t need certain “referee guarantees.” You can keep believing what you want if that comforts you. The one you should hate is Moggi, not Inter. Let alone Inter fans. But do whatever the hell you want; you’re the one who’s suffering. And for your European wish, I’m touching my balls superstitiously...
Voto:
With Roma, there was also a nice foul by Burdisso on Cambiasso during the goal. Not seen, amen, I'm not gonna let myself get all worked up even though with the three woodworks we hit, we certainly didn't deserve to lose. It went badly and that's that. Relax, freebird, it's not that important. I repeat that we played much better than the blues, but why am I telling you this... you just can't manage to have a bit of objectivity and get over that bitterness clouding your mind. Damn, I’m an Inter fan but I don’t have blinders on; if they whistle a questionable penalty or if we score from an offside position, I admit it. In Rome, offside goal, okay; against Chelsea in the first leg, we were spared a penalty, I agree. There have been times we've been penalized, but the essence doesn't change: right now in Italy, we are the clearly better team (and yet we risk losing the championship, not because of the referees) and the blues barely touched the ball, especially in the return match. Let's hope to win it without stealing the CL anyway. Chelsea suffered a theft against the blaugrana last year in the semifinals, not against us, so they complain about nothing, just like Mou does sometimes and like everyone does, following the established bad habits of a sport that carefully avoids introducing that damn video review. With that, by the way, you wouldn't have gone to Serie B because it would have been harder to cheat.
Voto:
If we win, I, panic, alfredo, larrock, carlocimmino, darkeve, and all the other wonderful de-interisti that I won't list here will come to your place to party. Are you happy?
Voto:
Freebird ... if what you say were penalties, the matches would end with the same scores as the scales 40 tournaments. It's sad to see you consumed by such bitterness ... but also no!
Voto:
"there is no enemy" ... my memory is stronger than the horror.
Voto:
Among these, I listened to an LP with a blue cover whose name I wanted to forget because it made me crap myself. Maybe this one will be better, but I'm still too shaken to dare a rapprochement.
Voto:
Freebird ... don't exaggerate. Three penalties, really? The truth is that in the two matches, Inter proved to be superior to Chelsea, playing two very strong games and didn't steal anything. To win the CL and advance past the semifinals against the blaugrana, a lot of luck will be needed because they are stronger. But in football, you can never say never ... technically, there is a huge gap between Inter and Barca that can be bridged with dynamism and aggression, as the blues showed last year. Almost never in football is a team's strength the "sum" of the players' skills. With that little bit of luck essential for the winners (even Barca and Utd had to rely on luck to win the last two editions), we might make it.
Relax a bit, little bird, if we really win, you'll risk a stroke, damn ... it's not worth it.
Voto:
Wonderful. Like a rectal examination performed by the Incredible Hulk.
Voto:
I didn't mind it ... I was just over twenty, had different tastes, and a remarkable amount less music in my ears. Still, some tracks hold up even now, come on. Great review.