Voto:
ethylic minimalism
Voto:
With that said, if anyone wants to experiment, I will gladly read it. With the reservations I have expressed. In the belief that there are far more valid artistic communicative forms that express a multitude. Music, theater ... and more. I fear an incoherent patchwork of maryshelleyan craftsmanship.
Voto:
Panapp is right. Partially. We've seen (and not just today) that writing can be many things. Fun, innovative, pedantic, or heuristic. Often sharp, sometimes much less so. We've read about theater, cinema, books, and all kinds of events. So Serenella's experiment isn't so detached from the site's philosophy. Especially if it could bring together the skills of those who really know how to write. And now we come to me and the reasons why I will never agree to such a proposal. 1- I am certainly not one of those who truly know how to write. 2- I detest any form of promiscuity, even in writing. 3- even in my mediocrity, I write when I have something to say, not driven or guided. Tracks aren't for me. I would experience all of this as reins on spontaneity and a grave for creativity, and nothing good would come of it. In fact... nothing would come out at all. 4- finally, I don't believe that writing can be a form of collective expression. It is individual, wonderfully individual, I would say. To bend it to a project like that would mean distorting it.
Voto:
Well well ... not my kind of music. But as for the review, absolutely. Nice.
Voto:
Welcome
Voto:
Beautiful yes
Voto:
Good job, but for some reason, they've always bored me. I find them ... too easy, I don't know.
Voto:
You've already pissed me off with the second review. Congratulations.
Voto:
I'll take care of the links. Anyway, just so you know, they were photos of asshole holes, vermicelli, scolici, and even Alien. If someone could do it for me, I would be grateful; I'm tragically a gerontosaurus when it comes to PC skills.
Voto:
shit ... the links aren't working. I'm an idiot.